Bumped from the main stage are Paul and Fiorina. Left are the not-so-magnificent seven, from Trump to Rubio to Cruz to…we’ve lost track: in the end, each and every one of these Republicans plies in the same extreme policies and backwards proposals.
You’ll hear shouts and insults and the usual attacks on minorities, women, and immigrants. You’ll see navy-blue suits and faux-angry gestures. But you won’t get a hint of progress—just the same tired spectacle we’ve come to expect.
Bottom line: These Republican hopefuls are all identical – out of touch and too extreme.
WHICH REPUBLICAN HOPEFULS HAVE OPPOSED A PATHWAY TO CITZENSHIP?
| Jeb Bush:
“During an interview Wednesday with the New Hampshire Union Leader in Manchester, Mr. Bush was asked whether he supported a pathway to full citizenship. He replied, ‘No.’ ‘What do we do with the 11 million people here? I think the answer is earned legal status,’ he said.” [Washington Times, 7/8/15]
|
Donald Trump:
“Donald Trump would reverse President Obama’s executive orders on immigration and deport all undocumented immigrants from the U.S. as president, he said in an exclusive interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd. ‘We’re going to keep the families together, but they have to go,’ he said in the interview, which aired in full on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ Sunday. Pressed on what he’d do if the immigrants in question had nowhere to return to, Trump reiterated: ‘They have to go.’ ‘We will work with them. They have to go. Chuck, we either have a country, or we don’t have a country,’ he said.” [NBC News, 8/16/15]
|
Ben Carson:
“CARSON: You also turn off the spigot that dispenses the goodies… DICKERSON: Right. CARSON: … so that people don’t have any incentive to come here. And then those who are here, you know, we have to recognize that we can’t just round them up, but we can give them an opportunity to register. I would give them a six-month period. And if they register and they have a pristine record, they haven’t been causing problems, I would give them an opportunity to become guest workers, not citizens, not voting people, not people who get goodies.” [CBS’s Face the Nation, 9/13/15] |
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Ted Cruz said that “a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is profoundly unfair.”
Carly Fiorina said, “My own view is, if you have come here illegally and stayed here illegally, that you don’t get a path to citizenship.” [MSNBC’s Morning Joe, 6/15/15]
Chris Christie stated that providing a pathway to citizenship was “an extreme way to go.”
John Kasich: Kasich remarked that he was “not for giving anybody a path to citizenship here.”
| Ben Carson:
“In response to a question by Sean Hannity about his views on gay marriage, Ben Carson said, ‘Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It’s a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn’t matter what they are. They don’t get to change the definition.’” [Slate, 3/28/13]
|
Marco Rubio:
“It doesn’t exist. There is no federal constitutional right to same sex marriage. There isn’t such a right. You have to have a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. constitution to reach the conclusion that people have a right to marry someone of the same sex.” [The Brody File, 4/26/15]
|
Ted Cruz:
“Cruz warned of the dangers of gay marriage a month after the Supreme Court decision in a July 2013 interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network. ‘If you look at other nations that have gone down the road towards gay marriage, that’s the next step where it gets enforced,’ he said. ‘It gets enforced against Christian pastors who decline to perform gay marriages, who speak out and preach biblical truths on marriage.’” [Huffington Post, 2/3/14]
|
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Donald Trump: On CNN’s State of the Union in this past summer, Trump stated he was for “traditional marriage.”
Jeb Bush: In a campaign press release, Bush wrote, “Guided by my faith, I believe in traditional marriage.”
Chris Christie: Christie criticized the Supreme Court ruling in favor of marriage equality.
John Kasich: Kasich opposed both same-sex marriage and civil unions.
| Donald Trump:
“CUOMO: You said I’m going to be great for women. I will do the most that can be done for women. Will you pass an equal pay? You know the statistics. You know, they don’t get paid what men do? TRUMP: I’m looking into that very strongly. I was asked that question yesterday. I’m looking into it very strongly. I will have a position on it in the not too distant future. One of the problems you have is you get to have an economy where it’s no longer free enterprise economy. You know, everybody gets the saying whether the — the concept of it is good. It’s a very complicated. The whole issue is a very complicated issue.” [CNN’s New Day, 8/11/15]
|
Jeb Bush:
“‘What’s the Paycheck Fairness Act?’ Bush asked, in an exchange captured by the liberal opposition research outfit American Bridge. Once the man he was speaking with defined it as a bill that would ensure that women get ‘equal pay for equal work,’ Bush took issue with his phrasing. ‘Equal pay for the same work, not for equal work — I think that’s the problem with it. I think there’s a definition issue,’ he said, before declining to say whether or not he thought Land should support the legislation.” [The Hill,10/15/14] |
John Kasich:
When challenged on the income gap in his home state: “’Well, a lot of it is based on experience,’ Kasich replied. ‘A lot of different factors go into it. It’s all tied up in skills. Do you not have the skills to be able to compete?’” [Think Progress, 10/7/15] |
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Ted Cruz: Cruz voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act multiple times. [S. 2199, 4/1/14; Senate roll call vote 260, 9/10/14; Senate roll call vote 262, 9/15/14]
Marco Rubio: Rubio said he voted against fair pay legislation because “all it really did is just help lawyers sue.”
Chris Christie: Christie vetoed “two sensible reforms that would help prevent women from getting cheated in their paychecks.”
| Donald Trump:
“I do not support expanding background checks. The current background checks do not work. They make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to acquire firearms while consistently failing to stop criminals from getting guns. We should re-examine our policy to make sure that these prohibitions do not impede law abiding citizens from exercising their Second Amendment rights.” [Ammoland, 7/7/15]
|
Jeb Bush:
“For a minute, the former Florida governor almost sounded like he supported expanding background checks to more gun purchases, agreeing with Colbert that the National Rifle Association’s opposition to mental health checks can be defeated. But then he continued, proving how little he understands about preventing gunviolence in the United States. ‘Why would you want to impose national gun laws on top of every circumstance of this country?’ he asked. When Colbert pointed out that the Second Amendment is applied nationally, so gun control should also be a national issue, Bush disagreed, saying that Florida is different from New York or Vermont.” [Think Progress, 9/9/15]
|
Ben Carson
“In an appearance on Wednesday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Dr. Ben Carson, author of the new book ‘One Nation: What We Can All Do to Save America’s Future’ discussed his views on the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Carson stated that in high-crime areas, ‘We should be able to engage in conversations about [the Second Amendment],’ and the discussion should center around ‘what can we agree on that doesn’t violate the Second Amendment?’ Carson did say that ‘the Second Amendment is the essential part of our Constitution,’ and clarified afterwards that expanded background checks and an assault weapons ban would be off the table in any discussions on the Second Amendment.” [Breitbart, 5/28/14]
|
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Ted Cruz opposed universal background checks for gun buyers.
Marco Rubio opposed bipartisan legislation to require background checks on gun purchases.
Rick Santorum opposed universal background checks for gun purchases.
John Kasich said of gun background checks: “I don’t think more laws are going to fix this.”
| Donald Trump:
“Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump wants to bar all Muslims from entering the United States. In a statement from his campaign, Trump called for a ‘total and complete shutdown’ of Muslims entering the United States until elected leaders can ‘figure out what is going on.’ When asked by The Hill whether that would include Muslim-American citizens currently abroad, Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks replied over email: ‘Mr. Trump says, ‘everyone.’’” [The Hill, 12/7/15]
|
Ted Cruz:
“Sen. Ted Cruz Sunday continued to call for Muslim refugees from Syria to be barred from entering the United States but opening the borders to displaced Christians, arguing there is not a ‘meaningful risk’ that Christians will commit terrorist acts. ‘There is no meaningful risk of Christians committing acts of terror. If there were a group of radical Christians pledging to murder anyone who had a different religious view than they, we would have a different national security situation,’ Cruz (R-Tex.) told reporters in a middle school gym here.” [Washington Post, 11/15/15]
|
Ben Carson:
“Ben Carson says the United States should not elect a Muslim president. ‘I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that,’ the retired neurosurgeon and Republican presidential candidate said Sunday on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press.’” [CNN,9/21/15]
|
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Marco Rubio said that Muslims were like “Germans who may have been members of the Nazi party, but weren’t violent themselves.” [ABC’s This Week, 11/15/15]
Jeb Bush said he supported making Syrian refugees “prove” they’re Christian as part of the vetting process.
Mike Huckabee said that “it’s time to wake up and smell the falafel” and close our borders to Syrian refugees.
Rand Paul supported reinstating a failed racial profiling program that targeted Muslims entering the country.
]]>Tuesday, December 15, 2015
Washington, DC – – Correct The Record delivered Mike Huckabee an individualized Donald Trump hat along with a letter in advance of the upcoming presidential debate. The must-have fashion accessory of the GOP, as worn by Trump himself, has been personalized with Huckabee’s discriminatory proposal to keep tabs on Muslims in the United States and block those who want to come here.
While Trump’s rhetoric may be more bombastic and his proposals more aggressive, Huckabee and other GOP presidential contenders would make it harder for Muslims to come to the U.S. The hateful proposals of the rest of the Republican presidential field are just as outrageous as Trump’s.
“Muslim-bashing Donald Trump thinks he can ‘Make America Great Again’ with policies that actually divide us, flout basic human rights, and aid terrorists’ recruitment efforts, and Mike Huckabee is no different,” said Daniel Wessel of Correct The Record. “Huckabee said on the refugee crisis: ‘It’s time to wake up and smell the falafel…We are importing terrorism.’ He called Muslims ‘uncorked animals’ and said Islam is ‘a religion that promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet.’ And despite his feeble protest of Trump’s ban on Muslims, Huckabee has pledged to support Trump as his nominee. We hope this personalized hat will help Mike Huckabee show America his true colors before the debate. Huckabee acts like Trump; now he can look like him too.”
Huckabee for President
PO Box 3357
Little Rock, AR 72203
Dear Mr. Huckabee,
Your friends at Correct The Record have sent you a gift – a signature Donald Trump hat, the type of hat worn by Trump himself, individualized with your own hateful proposal to keep tabs on Muslims in the United States and block those who want to come here.
You, sir, have said on the refugee crisis: “It’s time to wake up and smell the falafel…We are importing terrorism.” You called Muslims “uncorked animals” and said Islam is “a religion that promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet.”
Your policies divide us, flout basic human rights, and inevitably aid terrorists’ recruitment efforts. They are irresponsible, discriminatory, and contrary to America’s defining values.
Though Donald Trump’s Muslim-bashing rants are the loudest, you’re equally responsible for the creation of a deeply disturbing atmosphere in America. You support Trump’s fear-mongering and you imitate his efforts with hateful proposals of your own. We hope this hat will help you to show the American people your true colors. You act like Trump; now you can look like him too.
Sincerely,
Correct The Record
Correct The Record is a strategic research and rapid response team designed to defend Hillary Clinton from baseless attacks.
Correct The Record ∙ http://correct2016.wpengine.com/∙ Facebook ∙ @CorrectRecord
###
]]>Worse, it’s not only their rhetoric – the GOP presidential candidates’ prejudiced and un-American polices confirm this hate. The GOP excludes and demonizes minorities to prey on the fears of their base.
Trump knows better than anyone that the GOP presidential field stands together. Today on Morning Joe he said, “[The Republican candidates have] been condemning practically everything I say, and then they always come to my side… They’ve been condemning all of the things that I’ve been espousing, and now, most of them are on my side.”
Donald Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the United States. “Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump wants to bar all Muslims from entering the United States. In a statement from his campaign, Trump called for a ‘total and complete shutdown’ of Muslims entering the United States until elected leaders can ‘figure out what is going on.’ When asked by The Hill whether that would include Muslim-American citizens currently abroad, Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks replied over email: ‘Mr. Trump says, ‘everyone.’’” [The Hill, 12/7/15]
Donald Trump said he “would certainly implement” a national system to track Muslims in the United States. “Donald Trump ‘would certainly implement’ a database system tracking Muslims in the United States, the Republican front-runner told NBC News on Thursday night. ‘I would certainly implement that. Absolutely,’ Trump said in Newton, Iowa, in between campaign town halls. ‘There should be a lot of systems, beyond databases,’ he added. ‘We should have a lot of systems.’ When asked whether Muslims would be legally obligated to sign into the database, Trump responded, ‘They have to be — they have to be.’” [NBC News, 11/20/15]
Donald Trump falsely claimed that “Arab populations” in New Jersey “were cheering as the World Trade Center came down.” “Trump told ABC’s This Week: ‘There were people that were cheering on the other side of New Jersey where you have large Arab populations. They were cheering as the World Trade Center came down.’ If Trump actually saw this on television, it was perhaps on a special channel produced only for him and some of his followers. While Internet posts alleging this existed immediately following the terrorist attacks, police departments and local media said then and say now there were no such celebrations. Interestingly, fellow GOP candidate Ben Carson, who following Trump’s remarks also said he saw the cheering on TV, later said he had gotten confused, and footage of the celebrations was actually from East Jerusalem.” [National Journal, 11/30/15]
Ted Cruz: “I will shut down the broken immigration system that is letting jihadists into our country.” “If I am elected President, I will direct the Department of Defense to destroy ISIS. And I will shut down the broken immigration system that is letting jihadists into our country.” [Ted Cruz press release, 12/6/15]
Ted Cruz employed an anti-Sharia activist as his Tennessee state chairman. “Republican Ted Cruz’s presidential campaign is rejecting a call to drop an anti-Shariah activist as his state chairman for Tennessee. Kevin Kookogey, a former chairman of the Williamson County GOP, once criticized Republican Gov. Bill Haslam over the role of a Muslim staffer and a council that has advised two state departments on Islamic affairs. He presided over the 2012 passage of a resolution that said the governor had extended ‘preferential political status to Shariah adherents in Tennessee, thereby aiding and abetting the advancement of an ideology and doctrine which is wholly incompatible with the Constitution of the United States and the Tennessee Constitution.’ The Council on American-Islamic Relations urged Kookogey’s removal as Cruz’s Tennessee chairman, saying that keeping him in place would serve as what the group called ‘an endorsement of anti-Muslim hate.’” [Associated Press, 6/11/15]
Ben Carson compared Syrian refugees to “dogs.” “‘If there’s a rabid dog running around in your neighborhood, you’re probably not going to assume something good about that dog, and you’re probably going to put your children out of the way,’ retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson said Thursday in Mobile, Ala.,when he was asked about Syrian refugees. ‘It doesn’t mean that you hate all dogs by any stretch of the imagination, but you’re putting your intellect into motion.’” [Washington Post, 11/19/15]
Ben Carson said he would not support a Muslim for President of the United States. “Ben Carson says the United States should not elect a Muslim president. ‘I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that,’ the retired neurosurgeon and Republican presidential candidate said Sunday on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press.’” [CNN, 9/21/15]
Marco Rubio said that Muslims were like “Germans who may have been members of the Nazi party, but weren’t violent themselves.” “I don’t understand it. That would be like saying we weren’t at war with Nazis because we were afraid to offend some Germans who may have been members of the Nazi party, but weren’t violent themselves. We are at war with radical Islam, with an interpretation of Islam by a significant number of people around the world who they believe now justifies them in killing those who don’t agree with their ideology. This is a clash of civilizations. And as I said at the debate earlier this week, there is no middle ground on this. Either they win or we win, and we need to begin to take this seriously.” [ABC’s This Week, 11/15/15]
Marco Rubio said he was open to not allowing Muslim students to receive student visas in the U.S. “On Thursday morning, Rubio stood by his comments in an interview with Fox News host Martha MacCallum: MACCALLUM: You opened the door to perhaps not allowing Muslim students to receive student visas in this country. Did you mean that, 24 hours later? RUBIO: Yeah. Because, let me explain to you. We have to get proper perspective here. No one has a right to immigrate to the United States. No one has a right to visit the United States and no one has a right to get a visa to study in the United States.” [Think Progress, 4/24/13]
Jeb Bush said he supported making Syrian refugees “prove” they’re Christian as part of the vetting process. “Asked whether he would bar moderate Muslims entirely, Bush said he wants to see what the vetting process looks like first. He was also asked how he would distinguish between Muslims and Christians. ‘You can prove you’re a Christian,’ he said. Pressed further on how, Bush shrugged his shoulders and replied: ‘I think you can prove it. If you can’t prove it, then, you know, you err on the side of caution.’” [CNN, 11/18/15]
Mike Huckabee on the refugee crisis: “It’s time to wake up and smell the falafel…We are importing terrorism.” “Former governor of Arkansas and current presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee responded to Friday night’s terrorist attacks in Paris by saying on Saturday that the United States should close their borders to Syrian refugees. ‘It’s time to wake up and smell the falafel,’ Huckabee told Fox News’ Bret Baier, referring to the traditionally Middle Eastern dish that is — perhaps unbeknownst to him — loved and made by Christians, Jews and Muslims. ‘We are importing terrorism.’” [Huffington Post, 11/16/15]
Mike Huckabee called Muslims “uncorked animals” and said Islam is “a religion that promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet.” “Speaking on his radio program on Monday, Huckabee prefaced his remarks by saying that he understood it was ‘politically incorrect’ to ‘say anything unkind about Islam.’ He then went on to suggest that Islamic teachings were to blame for recent unrest during the holy month of Ramadan. ‘Can someone explain to me why it is that we tiptoe around a religion that promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet in their so-called “holiest days,”’ Huckabee said. ‘You know, if you’ve kept up with the Middle East, you know that the most likely time to have an uprising of rock throwing and rioting comes on the day of prayer on Friday. So the Muslims will go to the mosque, and they will have their day of prayer, and they come out of there like uncorked animals — throwing rocks and burning cars.’” [Huffington Post, 8/9/13]
Rick Santorum endorsed racial profiling of Muslims. “In a discussion over balancing national security and privacy, Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said Tuesday he would endorse profiling, specifically of Muslims and young men, in order to enhance security at airports. ‘We should be trying to find the bomber, not the bomb,’ the former Pennsylvania senator said at the CNN debate, explaining his support for profiling. He cited the use of profiling in Israel as an example of how it would work. Asked to explain by debate moderator CNN’s Wolf Blitzer who would be profiled, Santorum said, ‘The folks who are most likely to be committing these crimes.’” [CBS News, 11/23/11]
Rand Paul supported reinstating a failed racial profiling program that targeted Muslims entering the country. “So one would have thought that he would not try and do Lindsey Graham’s job for him and position himself as the frontman for the notorious National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) that is nothing if not surveillance-on-steroids. Implemented in the wake of 9-11, the program was a naked form of racial profiling that targeted Muslims and was finally suspended in 2011. Yet, Paul commented to Breitbart: ‘I’m going to have our subcommittee and maybe committee in Homeland Security look into whether or not we could reinstitute this NSEERS [National Security Entry Exit Registration System] program.’ So what did this program do? It not only singled out Muslims entering the country for extra interrogation at the airport (which is stupid because if they pose a threat then why grant them a visa at all?), it required Muslim foreign boys and men over 16 years already in the country to personally appear before Uncle Sam’s functionaries and register. […] So the entirely predictable upshot of the program was that although it managed to obtain not a single terrorism-related conviction, it did ruin plenty of lives of peaceful Muslims caught in its dragnet.” [Reason,7/18/15]
Lindsey Graham said that racial profiling of Muslims might be necessary to maintain national security. “The Maryland Democrat has sponsored the End Racial Profiling Act, which would prohibit law enforcement from using race or religion as a basis for search, seizure, or arrest for a half-dozen years. […] The only Republican to attend the Judiciary hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham, voiced general support for the bill but said profiling groups like Muslims might be necessary to maintain national security.” [Daily Beast, 5/13/12]
]]>TO: Interested Parties
FROM: Brad Woodhouse, President, Correct The Record
Today, the Republican presidential candidates will meet for their one and only debate exclusively focused on the economy. However, if you’re hoping for the GOP to finally show support for the middle class and a growth and fairness economy, prepare to be disappointed. The only economic message these candidates are interested in parroting is the one fed to them by mega-donors like the Koch Brothers.
On issues from tax reform, to Medicare and Social Security, to demeaning programs that create economic opportunity for working class and middle class Americans, to opposing equal pay for women, the Republican candidates are all cut from the same cloth. We’ve seen what happens when a Republican president slashes taxes for the wealthy, goes on a spending spree, and ignores economic support for those who need it most, and America is not going back to Bush-style economics. Only Hillary Clinton has the forward-looking economic agenda America needs to raise the incomes of ordinary Americans, make the wealthy and CEO’s pay their fair share and create true and lasting growth and prosperity.
Look below for a sampling of the GOP’s out of touch, out of date and tried-and-failed economic policies.
KOCH DEMAND #1:
END MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY AS WE KNOW THEM
| Marco Rubio:
“[Rubio] said he supports gradually raising the Social Security retirement age, which now sits at 67, for future beneficiaries, and embraced Rep. Paul Ryan’s push to transition Medicare into a ‘premium-support’ plan, where seniors would be given a voucher to buy insurance on the private market.” [Washington Times, 5/13/14]
“U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio has drawn flak this week from Democrats and retirement experts for his comments that [programs like Medicare and Social Security] have ‘weakened us as a people.’” [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 8/25/11]
|
Ben Carson:
“Republicans have fended off accusations for years that they’d gut Medicare for seniors and end the program ‘as we know it.’ Not Ben Carson. The former neurosurgeon acknowledges he would abolish the program altogether. Below Carson, who now leads the GOP field in Iowa according to the latest Quinnipiac Poll, would eliminate the program that provides health care to 49 million senior citizens, as well as Medicaid, and replace it with a system of cradle-to-grave savings accounts which would be funded with $2,000 a year in government contributions.” [Politico, 10/22/15] |
Jeb Bush:
“Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said Wednesday that we ought to phase out Medicare, the federal program that provides health insurance to Americans once they’re 65. ‘We need to make sure we fulfill the commitment to people that have already received the benefits, that are receiving the benefits,’ Bush said. ‘But we need to figure out a way to phase out this program for others and move to a new system that allows them to have something, because they’re not going to have anything.’” [Huffington Post, 7/23/15] |
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Donald Trump: On phasing out Medicare with private savings accounts: “I’m OK with the savings accounts. I think it’s a good idea.”
Ted Cruz: Cruz supported increasing the Medicare retirement age and transitioning it to a “premium support” voucher system.
Rand Paul: Paul introduced legislation that would end traditional Medicare and supported raising the Medicare retirement age to 70.
Chris Christie: Christie called for an increase in the Medicare retirement age and for means testing Social Security.
Bobby Jindal: Jindal presented a health care plan that proposed turning Medicare into a voucher system.
KOCH DEMAND #2:
A TAX PLAN THAT SOAKS THE MIDDLE CLASS AND HELPS THE RICH
| Marco Rubio:
“If he wins his party’s nomination, though, Rubio will have to defend a tax plan that, while said to address the challenges of the middle class, includes a huge break that all-but bypasses the middle and greatly boosts the rich. It was a tax plan that was even too large for Romney himself to run on. The latest version of Rubio’s tax plan, which he released with fellow Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) in March, shrinks the income tax down to two rates, lowering the top rate in the process, and includes new tax breaks for working families. It also eliminates all taxes on dividends and capital gains. That’s where rich taxpayers cash in. They are overwhelmingly the ones in the economy who draw income from capital, such as holdings and sales of stocks.” [Washington Post, 4/14/15]
|
Ben Carson:
“[Fox News Sunday host] Chris Wallace confronted Carson with tax experts, who found that to raise the same amount of revenue the federal government currently takes in [under Carson’s flat tax plan], the government would have to impose a 20 percent tax across the board. (The Tax Policy Center argues it would have to be at least 25 percent.) ‘Middle incomes would get a tax hike and wealthy families would get a tax cut,’ Wallace explained. Carson countered that he simply didn’t ‘agree with that assessment.’ […] Wallace followed up by asking about low-income families, […] ‘Now you’ll have them pay 10 to 15 percent of income they have — or 20 percent if my experts are right. A lot of independent studies say the people that make like bandits in this are the wealthy.’” [Think Progress, 5/10/15]
|
Donald Trump:
“[The Tax Foundation] says the proposal from the real estate magnate Donald J. Trump, who leads Republican polls, would raise incomes of the top 1 percent of earners 27 percent — also the most of any group.” [New York Times, 10/14/15] |
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Ted Cruz: Cruz has called for a national flat tax, a proposal that has been called a “colossal giveaway to the rich.”
Jeb Bush: Bush’s federal tax plan offered up a massive tax cut for the richest Americans.
Carly Fiorina: Fiorina has, according to observers, espoused “more or less the official line of the Republican Party on taxation.”
Mike Huckabee: According to the New York Times, Huckabee favored “a tax plan that analysts say…disproportionately benefits the affluent.”
Rand Paul: Paul’s tax plan would most benefit incomes above $1 million.
Chris Christie: Christie pushed to cut the income tax rate for the wealthiest Americans by 11 percent and lower the corporate tax rate by 10 percent.
John Kasich: Kasich supported a plan that would cut taxes for the top 1 percent in Ohio while increasing the tax burden on the bottom 60 percent of earners.
Lindsey Graham: Graham said it was “stupid” to allow tax cuts for the wealthy to expire.
Bobby Jindal: According to Vox, Jindal’s tax plan would “eliminate the standard deduction and personal/dependent exemptions that currently let many working-class families avoid income taxes.”
KOCH DEMAND #3:
DEMEAN PROGRAMS THAT LEVEL THE ECONOMIC PLAYING FIELD AS “FREE STUFF”
| Marco Rubio:
“‘If you watched that debate last night it looked like something from the early ‘80s,’ Rubio said on ‘Fox and Friends.’ ‘It was basically a liberal verses liberal debate about who was going to give away the most free stuff: Free college education, free college education for people illegally in this country, free health care, free everything.’ ‘Their answer to every problem in America is a government program and a tax increase. That’s all they prescribe time and time again,’ he continued.” [Talking Points Memo, 10/14/15]
|
Rand Paul:
“In delivering a tea party response to the State of the Union, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) suggested that President Obama has won over lower-income voters with ‘free stuff,’ an echo of Mitt Romney’s comments on the 47 percent and ‘gifts’ to key demographics. ‘The president offers you free stuff, but his policies keep you poor,’ Paul said, adding that ‘the ranks of the poor have swelled’ during Obama’s tenure.” [Washington Post, 2/12/13]
|
Jeb Bush:
“‘Our message is one of hope and aspiration,’ [Jeb Bush] said at the East Cooper Republican Women’s Club annual Shrimp Dinner. ‘It isn’t one of division and get in line and we’ll take care of you with free stuff. Our message is one that is uplifting — that says you can achieve earned success.’” [Washington Post, 9/24/15] |
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Chris Christie: Christie suggested that raising taxes on the wealthy was part of a “gimme gimme gimme attitude.”
Rick Santorum: Santorum: “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.”
KOCH DEMAND #4:
OPPOSE EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN AT ALL COSTS
| Marco Rubio:
“Republicans, seeking to mitigate the fallout after recent debates over women’s health have cast them in a harsh light among female voters, were careful not to be seen as rooting against the cause of equal pay. Instead, they decried the bill as a political stunt. ‘It’s pure election-year politics,’ said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL). ‘This bill reads more to me like some sort of a welfare plan for trial lawyers.’” [Talking Points Memo, 6/5/12; Senate roll call vote 115, 6/5/12; Senate roll call vote 103, 4/9/14; Senate roll call vote 260, 9/10/14; Senate roll call vote 262, 9/15/14]
|
John Kasich:
“Women working in Republican Gov. John Kasich’s office earn $9.81-an-hour less, on average, than men, the Dayton Daily News analysis published Sunday showed. That’s the highest gender pay gap among statewide officeholders, according to the newspaper’s study of Ohio Department of Administrative Services data. The gender gap compares to $3.99-an-hour under former Gov. Ted Strickland.” [Associated Press, 4/21/14] |
Jeb Bush:
“‘What’s the Paycheck Fairness Act?’ Bush asked, in an exchange captured by the liberal opposition research outfit American Bridge. Once the man he was speaking with defined it as a bill that would ensure that women get ‘equal pay for equal work,’ Bush took issue with his phrasing. ‘Equal pay for the same work, not for equal work — I think that’s the problem with it. I think there’s a definition issue,’ he said, before declining to say whether or not he thought Land should support the legislation.” [The Hill, 10/15/14] |
AND THE REST? THEY’RE ALL THE SAME.
Donald Trump: Trump said equal pay legislation could lead to “an economy where it’s no longer free enterprise economy.”
Ted Cruz: Cruz voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act multiple times. [S. 2199, 4/1/14; Senate roll call vote 260, 9/10/14; Senate roll call vote 262, 9/15/14]
Carly Fiorina: Fiorina called equal pay legislation “tokens” and “gestures.”
Rand Paul: Paul voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act multiple times and compared equal pay legislation to the Soviet Politburo. [Senate roll call vote 115, 6/5/12; Senate roll call vote 103, 4/9/14; Senate roll call vote 260, 9/10/14; Senate roll call vote 262, 9/15/14]
Chris Christie: Christie vetoed what the Star-Ledger called “two sensible reforms that would help prevent women from getting cheated in their paychecks.”
Lindsey Graham: Graham voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act and the Fair Pay Act. [Senate roll call vote 14, 1/22/09; Senate roll call vote 115, 6/5/12; Senate roll call vote 103, 4/9/14; Senate roll call vote 262, 9/15/14]
Rick Santorum: Santorum opposed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, calling it “a trial lawyer’s bill.”
Bobby Jindal: Jindal voted against the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
]]>Both Jeb’s decision and his justification are flat wrong. In fact, since the 2010 midterm election, 21 states have enacted new laws to restrict voting rights. Over the past few years, Florida has passed voting laws that disenfranchised more than 1.3 million voters in the 2014 gubernatorial election–an election that was decided by only 72,000 votes.
Just this week, after the GOP’s long-waged war on voting rights continued in Alabama, Hillary Clinton expressed outrage, stating: “Just a few years ago, Alabama passed a law requiring citizens to have a photo ID to vote. Now they’re shutting down places where people get those photo IDs. This is only going to make it harder for people to vote.” As Hillary said, this is “a blast from the Jim Crow past.”
That is exactly what Jeb Bush and the entire Republican field represent—a dangerous blast from the past.
Jeb Bush on the Voting Rights Act: “I don’t support reauthorizing it as is.” “Jeb Bush thinks the country’s landmark law to prevent discrimination against voters of color has run its course. […] To Bush, singling out states for their historic racism is no longer relevant. ‘If it’s to reauthorize it to continue to provide regulations on top of states as though we are living in 1960—’cause those were basically when many of those rules were put in place—I don’t believe that we should do that,’ he said. ‘There has been dramatic improvement in access to voting. I mean, exponentially better improvement. And I don’t think there is a role for the federal government to play in most places, could be some, but in most places where they did have a constructive role in the ‘60s. So I don’t support reauthorizing it as is.’” [Mother Jones, 10/8/15]
The Jeb Bush administration purged 12,000 eligible voters from the Florida voter rolls ahead of the 2000 presidential election. According to Rolling Stone, “Back in 2000, 12,000 eligible voters – a number twenty-two times larger than George W. Bush’s 537 vote triumph over Al Gore – were wrongly identified as convicted felons and purged from the voting rolls in Florida, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. African Americans, who favored Gore over Bush by 86 points, accounted for 11 percent of the state’s electorate but 41 percent of those purged.” [Rolling Stone, 5/30/12]
Jeb Bush attempted a similar voter purge ahead of the 2004 presidential election. “In May 2004, another presidential election year, Jeb Bush’s administration once again sought to purge its voter rolls of convicted felons. Owing to the previous controversy with DBT, the state Legislature decided that the Department of Elections should create its own list. Once again, the process was flawed. When the list became public in July 2004, a major error became readily apparent: Of the 48,000 people on the new purge list, 22,000 were African Americans but only 61 were Hispanic. African Americans vote heavily Democratic while Hispanics, at that time in Florida, largely voted Republican. This prompted speculation that Jeb Bush’s administration was at best incompetent and at worst, playing politics with its purge list. Facing widespread criticism, it agreed not to use the list.” [Mother Jones, 4/10/15]
Jeb Bush signed into law Florida legislation that restricted the hours and locations for early voting. “Bush and the GOP-led Legislature went the other way the next year, passing a law that capped the number of hours for early voting and confined it to election offices, city halls and libraries.” [Politifact, 11/8/12; House Bill 1567, 5/6/05]
Jeb Bush supported more stringent voter identification laws. In his book, Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution, Jeb Bush wrote, “Finally, states should be allowed to protect the integrity of the franchise with voter identification laws, which are supported by a large majority of Americans, including Hispanics. So long as states make it simple for citizens to obtain such forms of identification, they should have the latitude to require such identification for voting or to secure welfare benefits.” [Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution, pg. 38-39, 2013]
Ben Carson said opponents of voter ID laws were “manipulators.” CARSON: “A classic example of this kind of manipulation is the effort to convince minority voters that anyone advocating officially recognized identification cards is racist, concocting tales of voter fraud. Manipulators will claim that their opponents are trying to suppress the vote by demanding identification cards in areas where they fear they won’t do well electorally.” [Ben Carson, One Vote: Make Your Voice Heard, pg. 38-39, 10/9/14]
Ted Cruz called for the repeal of a provision of the Voting Rights Act that protected minority voters from discrimination. “It’s time to do away with the nearly 50-year-old federal rule that let U.S. officials block a new state law requiring Texans to show photo ID to vote. That’s what Republicans candidates running to replace Kay Bailey Hutchison in the U.S. Senate said during a forum Thursday night. They called for repeal of the Voting Rights Act provision that requires Texas and other Southern states with histories of discrimination to receive pre-clearance when changing election laws. ‘Right now, Texas is subjected to different standards than much of the country,’ former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz said during the forum, hosted by the Dallas Bar Association. ‘I think we need to be fighting to ensure the law is colorblind and fair to everyone.’” [Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 3/16/12]
Ted Cruz’s Iowa campaign chair crusaded “to restrict voting under the guise of combating voter fraud.” “[Ted Cruz’s] best play so far has been snagging former Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz to be his state chairman there, considering that three years ago Schultz was a prominent supporter of Santorum, who is about to announce his 2016 presidential bid. By tapping Schultz, Cruz also tied himself to Schultz’s leading cause: trying to restrict voting under the guise of combating voter fraud. During his four years as secretary of state, Schultz spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to unearth evidence of fraud but ended up finding little and being cited for the mismanagement of public funds.” [Mother Jones, 5/26/15]
Ted Cruz introduced federal legislation requiring voters to present “proof of citizenship” before casting ballots. “Ted Cruz didn’t wait long to mount a legislative response to the Supreme Court’s ruling against Arizona’s voter registration rule. An amendment submitted by the Texas senator on Monday afternoon to the Senate’s immigration bill would ‘permit states to require proof of citizenship for registration to vote in elections for federal office.’ Cruz’s measure would amend the National Voter Registration Act.” [Politico, 6/17/13; S. Amdt. 1295, 6/17/13]
Marco Rubio supported cutting Florida’s early voting period in half, claiming it “was really not cost effective.” RUBIO: “But we also know, for example, that in the early stages of the – of campaigns, we used to have a two-week voting period in Florida. The cost-benefit analysis of the first week of voting was really not – was really not cost effective. In essence, the number of people voting versus the cost to local governments to comply or to carry out that voting were – the turnout just didn’t justify the expenditure in the first week.” [Tampa Bay Times, 6/13/12]
As a member of the Florida House of Representatives, Marco Rubio voted in favor of a bill that restricted the hours and locations for early voting. “Bush and the GOP-led Legislature went the other way the next year, passing a law that capped the number of hours for early voting and confined it to election offices, city halls and libraries.” [Politifact, 11/8/12; House Bill 1567, 5/6/05; Vote #572, 5/6/05]
Marco Rubio on voter ID laws: “What’s the big deal? What is the big deal?” “During a campaign stop last month with Romney in Pennsylvania, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, a Cuban-American Republican, blew off what he sees as overhyped concerns about showing photo IDs. People have to show IDs for everything from boarding a flight to renting sports equipment, Rubio reasoned, so why not voting. ‘What’s the big deal? What is the big deal?’ Rubio asked.” [CNN, 5/29/12]
Mike Huckabee said that the idea that voter ID laws disenfranchise voters was “phony nonsense.” “When I go to vote, the people at my voting station recognize me, even call me by name, but I still gladly show them my photo ID just in case there is some unlucky chump who looks just like me. I don’t mind. And the president shows his ID even in his hometown of Chicago. He didn’t object either. So let’s stop the phony nonsense that requiring an ID disenfranchises voters who are old or black. I’m getting old, and Obama is black, and it didn’t disenfranchise either one of us.” [Huckabee, FOX News, 10/27/12]
Mike Huckabee supported voter ID laws that would make voting more difficult. “The former Arkansas governor told the crowd at an Americans for Prosperity conference last month that sometimes he thinks the United States has less freedom than North Korea. ‘When I go to the airport, I have to get in the surrender position. People put hands all over me. And I have to provide photo ID in a couple of different forms and prove that I really am not going to terrorize the airplane. But if I want to go vote, I don’t need a thing.’” [Washington Post, 5/12/14]
Mike Huckabee suggested supporters of an anti-union law deflate the tires of voters on the other side of the issue on Election Day. “Former GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has some advice for people who support the anti-union law passed in Ohio that faces a statewide repeal vote on November 8: Find out who’s voting to repeal the bill and block them from ballot box. The onetime Arkansas governor suggested deflating tires and giving these voters the wrong election date. ‘That’s up to you, how you creatively get the job done,’ Huckabee quipped.” [Mother Jones, 10/17/11]
John Kasich signed into law legislation “that cut early voting and eliminated same-day registration in his state.” “Kasich, the governor of Ohio – for years the most important presidential swing state – signed legislation this year that cut early voting and eliminated same-day registration in his state—making it harder for minorities to get to the polls. That law, too, drew charges that it violated the VRA, and a trial is likely later this year.” [MSNBC, 1/19/15; SB 205, 10/10/13; SB 238, 11/13/13]
Cleveland Plain-Dealer Editorial Board: John Kasich signed voter ID legislation that was “a breathtaking bid to suppress voting despite constitutional guarantees of voting rights.” “Ohio’s Republican-run General Assembly has now passed three bills aimed at holding down voting by black or low-income Ohioans, a breathtaking bid to suppress voting despite constitutional guarantees of voting rights. Unwisely, Republican Gov. John Kasich has signed all of them into law. Cuyahoga County Executive Ed FitzGerald, Kasich’s likely Democratic opponent for governor in the fall, has already announced he intends — if he can get County Council’s support — to test one of the new laws, Substitute Senate Bill 205. It forbids anyone but the secretary of state’s office from sending out unsolicited absentee ballot applications.” [Cleveland Plain-Dealer, 3/1/14; SB 205, 10/10/13; SB 216, 10/29/13; SB 238, 11/13/13]
Chris Christie vetoed legislation that would have expanded opportunities for early voting. “Gov. Chris Christie today vetoed a bill that would allow early voting at polling places, prompting Democrats to brand it a politically motivated effort to suppress the vote months after Hurricane Sandy exposed vulnerabilities in the state elections system. The Republican governor called a proposal to let voters cast ballots at designated polling places during a 15-day period before Election Day ‘hasty, counterproductive and less reliable’ than the current system.” [Star-Ledger, 5/9/13; S. 2364, 11/29/12]
Chris Christie opposed same-day voter registration. “New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie slammed a voter registration method as a political ploy this week while speaking in Illinois. ‘Same-day registration, all of sudden, this year comes to Illinois. Shocking. It’s shocking. I’m sure it was all based on public policy, good public policy to get same-day registration here in Illinois just this year when the governor is in the toilet and needs as much help as he can get,’ Christie said Monday, according to The Chicago Tribune. He was campaigning for Republican Bruce Rauner, who is challenging Illinois’ Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn this November. Christie chairs the Republican Governors Association.” [MSNBC, 8/28/14]
Chris Christie suggested that the civil rights gains of the 1960s should have been decided by popular referendum. “New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is under fire for suggesting white southerners should have been allowed to vote civil rights gains for blacks during the 1960s. His remark came as the State Senate Judiciary Committee was about to approve a bill this week that would move New Jersey a step closer to legalizing gay marriage. […] And then he said: ‘People would have been happy to have a referendum on civil rights rather than fighting and dying in the streets in the South.’” [NBC New York, 1/26/12]
Rand Paul failed to sign on to legislation that would restore key voter protection provisions of the Voting Rights Act despite claiming to support these protections. “Why doesn’t the Republican Party become the party that champions voting rights? It’s a good question. But the good follow-up question is, why doesn’t Rand Paul do actual work on the problem? In July, for example, the Kentucky senator boasted, ‘I’m a Republican who wants to restore a federal role for the government in the Voting Rights Act.’ Terrific. But there’s a bipartisan legislative proposal to repair the Voting Rights Act following last year’s Supreme Court ruling, and as of this morning, Paul has neither signed on as a co-sponsor nor introduced an alternative.” [MSNBC, 9/22/14; S. 1945, 1/16/14]
Rand Paul walked back “comments in which the senator appeared to urge Republicans to back off ‘crazy’ voting laws that minorities found offensive.” “Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) office is walking back recent comments in which the senator appeared to urge Republicans to back off ‘crazy’ voting laws that minorities found offensive. ‘At no point did Senator Paul come out against voter ID laws,’ Paul’s former chief of staff and current PAC director told Slate. ‘In terms of the specifics of voter ID laws, Senator Paul believes it’s up to each state to decide that type of issue.’ Such laws are popular with Republicans, who claim they are needed to address the issue of voter fraud, but critics say stringent measures like the one recently signed into law in North Carolina suppress the votes of minorities, seniors and young adults. Paul has been mindful of the issue as he reaches out to black voters on college campuses ahead of a possible presidential run in 2016.” [Huffington Post, 5/13/14]
Rand Paul supported making voter ID laws stricter. “Paul thinks the GOP needs to reach out to minorities if it is to win back the White House. He urges combining voter ID with moves to expand voting rights, such as legislation to restore voting rights to felons. ‘So I’m not really opposed to [voter ID]. I am opposed to it as a campaign theme,’ said Kentucky’s junior senator. In other words, he supports voter ID, but doesn’t want to talk about it. That’s the way Democrats saw it anyway, and many of them claimed Paul’s response showed he is willing to remake himself to appeal to core Republican voters in advance of the 2016 presidential race.” [Christian Science Monitor, 11/3/14]
Rick Santorum on early voting: “I hate it.” “Speaking to Sean Hannity on his radio show on Wednesday, former GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum claimed that letting citizens cast ballots in person before Election Day opens the door to corruption: Hannity: I don’t like this early voting -Santorum: I hate it. Hannity: It’s been going on forever -Santorum: I hate it. Hannity: And it opens up the door to corruption. Santorum: It does. And look, the race changed from a month ago. When Ohio was early voting, it was before the first debate and the people who went out and voted, really in my opinion, really didn’t know Governor Romney and what kind of candidate he really is and the real distinction between Romney and Obama.” [Huffington Post, 10/26/12]
Rick Santorum on voter ID: “In my opinion, the only reason you don’t have a voter ID is you want to continue to perpetrate fraud.” “KEYES: Voter ID has been a big issue here in Wisconsin. I know Lindsey Graham has proposed a national voter ID law. Is that something you would sign as president? SANTORUM: I think that’s a state issue. I support voter ID. In my opinion, the only reason you don’t have a voter ID is you want to continue to perpetrate fraud.” [Think Progress, 3/29/12]
Rick Santorum expressed support for voter ID laws, calling them “crucial electoral reforms.” In a statement, Rick Santorum said, “I commend Governor Perry, Texas, and the many states like Texas that are fighting to ensure voter fraud does not impede the electoral process. As President I will stand with them and support their efforts for crucial electoral reforms.” [Statement on the Obama Administration Blocking Texas Voter ID Law, 3/12/12]
Bobby Jindal applauded the Supreme Court’s ruling that gutted the Voting Rights Act. “The Supreme Court didn’t strike down the pre-clearance rule itself. The justices invalidated the formula that has required mainly Southern states to get Washington’s approval for voting laws, saying it does not account for racial progress and societal changes across the country. Gov. Bobby Jindal applauded the high court’s ruling.” [Associated Press, 6/25/13]
Bobby Jindal was sued by the NAACP for failing to reform alleged discriminatory voting systems in a Louisiana parish. “Louisiana’s Terrebonne Parish has never elected a black judge, even though one in five parish residents is African-American. In fact, it re-elected a white parish judge who had been suspended for wearing black-face as part of a racist parody Halloween costume. Lawyers for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund say the problem is the discriminatory voting system the parish uses, and last year they sued Gov. Bobby Jindal under the Voting Rights Act to force a change. On Friday, they filed papers asking a federal judge for a summary judgment in their favor. […] The plaintiffs say they named Jindal as a defendant because he has the power to sign legislation into law that would change the system.” [MSNBC, 8/26/15]
The NAACP “took Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration to court over a statewide practice that prevented many low-income, minority Louisianans from registering to vote.” “Recently, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and other national voting rights groups took Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration to court over a statewide practice that prevented many low-income, minority Louisianans from registering to vote. Just last month, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled partially in their favor, finding that Louisiana violated the National Voter Registration Act by failing to provide voter registration services at the state’s public service agencies — such as the departments where residents can sign up for Medicaid and food stamps.” [Think Progress, 12/6/14]
Lindsey Graham praised the Supreme Court’s move to strike down a portion of the Voting Rights Act. “Voting is a fundamental right guaranteed to all United States citizens. I will continue to do everything in my power to ensure elections are free and fair for every South Carolinian. Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was a necessary tool to preserve voting rights, but due to the reform and advances in South Carolina election law, it is no longer necessary. The Supreme Court noted this tremendous progress in South Carolina’s electoral system and it was the underpinning of their decision. I concur with the Court that our state has made tremendous progress.” [Senator Lindsey Graham press release, 6/25/13]
Lindsey Graham supported stricter federal voter identification laws. “Congress should follow in the footsteps of state legislatures and pass a federal voter ID law that requires voters to present photo identification at the polls, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said Thursday. Graham defended South Carolina’s recently passed voter ID law, which is under review by the Justice Department. ‘I think what South Carolina did makes eminent sense to me,’ Graham said at a hearing on state voting laws chaired by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL). Durbin called the incidence of voter fraud in America minimal and said reported fraud ‘is often anecdotal, unsubstantiated and contrived.’ Graham disagreed.” [Talking Points Memo, 9/8/11]
]]>The contrast between the values His Holiness spoke about during his visit and those to be discussed at the Values Voter Summit is stark. These Republican hopefuls are expected to disagree with some of Pope Francis’ most emphasized values when it comes to the GOP’s positions on economic inequality, immigration reform, climate change and more. Perhaps Pope Francis should take the GOP back to Sunday School.
For more contrast in values between the Pope and Republican presidential hopefuls, see Correct The Record’s analysis below:
“I would encourage you to keep in mind all those people around us who are trapped in a cycle of poverty. They too need to be given hope.”
– Pope Francis, 9/24/15
Donald Trump opposed letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy expire. “In 2010, Trump opposed President Obama’s plan to let the Bush-era tax cuts on the wealthy expire and months later he signed anti-tax lobbyist Grover Norquist’s pledge to veto any new taxes.” [Huffington Post, 1/2/13]
Donald Trump supported replacing the income tax with “either a fair tax…a flat tax or certainly a simplified code” and proposed repealing the corporate income tax. “Trump overcame his moral objections to the flat tax. On April 15, he told Fox News that he’d like to replace the income tax with ‘either a fair tax’ (i.e., a national sales tax), ‘a flat tax or certainly a simplified code.’ He also proposes repealing the corporate income tax because, he wrote in his 2011 book, it would ‘create an unprecedented jobs boom.’” [Politico, 7/26/15]
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy: Donald Trump’s policies “would disproportionately hurt lower-income Americans.” ”Billionaire businessman, television personality and now presidential candidate Donald Trump is the latest candidate to jump into the race. He has made a number of tax proposals. His more recent proposals, in contrast to ones he proposed back around the 2000 election, would likely sharply increase the national debt and make the U.S. tax system substantially more regressive by both cutting taxes for the rich and creating a massive new tax that would disproportionately hurt lower-income Americans.” [Institute On Taxation And Economic Policy, 6/22/15]
Donald Trump said he would not increase the minimum wage. “Trump said he would not increase the minimum wage, adding that the U.S. needs to bring back jobs from places like Mexico, China and India.” [Politico, 6/18/15]
Ben Carson supported eliminating progressive aspects of the tax code in favor of one flat rate for all incomes. “Carson’s big idea is to remove much of the progressivity from the tax system, imposing a single rate of about 10 to 15 percent. ‘The one that I’ve advocated is based on tithing, because I think God is a pretty fair guy,’ Carson said during August’s debate in Cleveland. ‘And He said, you know, if you give me a tithe, it doesn’t matter how much you make.’ What the campaign hasn’t figured out yet, Rustici said, is whether it’s an income tax or a consumption tax and what deductions should vanish.” [Bloomberg, 9/8/15]
Fox News’s Chris Wallace: Ben Carson’s “flat tax” plan would raise income taxes on the poor while the wealthy “make like bandits.” “Dr. Ben Carson, now a Republican presidential candidate, has long proposed a ‘flat tax’ for the country, citing the Bible’s tithing as his inspiration. […] But on Sunday, host Chris Wallace confronted Carson with tax experts, who found that to raise the same amount of revenue the federal government currently takes in, the government would have to impose a 20 percent tax across the board. (The Tax Policy Center argues it would have to be at least 25 percent.) ‘Middle incomes would get a tax hike and wealthy families would get a tax cut,’ Wallace explained. Carson countered that he simply didn’t ‘agree with that assessment.’ […] Wallace followed up by asking about low-income families, who not only don’t pay taxes, but usually receive an earned income tax credit instead. ‘Now you’ll have them pay 10 to 15 percent of income they have — or 20 percent if my experts are right. A lot of independent studies say the people that make like bandits in this are the wealthy.’” [Think Progress, 5/10/15]
Jeb Bush’s presidential tax plan offered up a massive tax cut for the richest Americans. “Like Romney, Bush offers up a massive tax cut for the richest Americans, calling in his op-ed to slash the top tax rate from 39.6 percent to just 28 percent. In an effort to simplify what Bush calls the burdensome complexity of the tax code, he says he’d eliminate some current deductions, like the one that allows companies to write off the cost of borrowing.” [Huffington Post, 9/8/15]
Jeb Bush called for an end to the federal minimum wage. “We need to leave it to the private sector. I think state minimum wages are fine. The federal government shouldn’t be doing this. This is one of those poll-driven deals. It polls well, I’m sure – I haven’t looked at the polling, but I’m sure on the surface without any conversation, without any digging into it people say, ‘Yea, everybody’s wages should be up.’ And in the case of Wal-Mart they have raised wages because of supply and demand and that’s good.” [MSNBC, 3/18/15]
Marco Rubio’s tax plan “includes a huge break that all-but bypasses the middle and greatly boosts the rich.” “If he wins his party’s nomination, though, Rubio will have to defend a tax plan that, while said to address the challenges of the middle class, includes a huge break that all-but bypasses the middle and greatly boosts the rich. It was a tax plan that was even too large for Romney himself to run on. The latest version of Rubio’s tax plan, which he released with fellow Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) in March, shrinks the income tax down to two rates, lowering the top rate in the process, and includes new tax breaks for working families. It also eliminates all taxes on dividends and capital gains. That’s where rich taxpayers cash in. They are overwhelmingly the ones in the economy who draw income from capital, such as holdings and sales of stocks.” [Washington Post, 4/14/15]
Brookings Institution budget expert explained that Marco Rubio’s proposed tax credits would do nothing for low-income earners. “Critics, like Isabel Sawhill, a budget expert at the Brookings Institution, argue that the credit may help some middle- and upper-income families but it would do nothing for low-income earners. The credits are only refundable against income tax and payroll taxes. Low-income workers that already collect the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit typically already get breaks above and beyond the taxes they pay so the Rubio and Lee plan wouldn’t add anything to their refund. ‘It is a big increase in the child tax credit for middle-class families and above but doesn’t help anyone at the bottom,’ Sawhill said. ‘Low-income families don’t have enough payroll and income tax liability to make them eligible for it.’” [Politico, 3/3/15]
Marco Rubio sought to slash the corporate tax rate to 25%. “First, by consolidating the corporate tax system into a single layer and lowering the maximum rate to 25% on both corporate and pass-through entities, our plan eliminates double taxation of capital gains and dividends, and establishes parity among large and small businesses.” [Marco Rubio and Mike Lee, Wall Street Journal, 3/3/15]
Marco Rubio voted against legislation to end the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. In January 2013, Rubio voted against a deal permanently extending the 2001 and 2003 Bush income, capital gains and dividend tax cuts for the first $400,000 (or $450,000 for joint-filers) of income. Rates on income above those thresholds reverted back to their Clinton-era rates. The bill passed by a vote of 89 to 8; President Obama signed the bill the next day. This vote occurred on January 1, 2013, but is part of the 2012 session. [Senate Vote 251, 1/1/13; CQ Weekly, 1/05/13]
Marco Rubio opposed increasing the minimum wage. “Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who gave the Republican response to the State of The Union Tuesday, came out in opposition to minimum wage laws Wednesday, following President Barack Obama’s proposal in Tuesday night’s address to raise the minimum wage to $9 per hour. ‘I support people making more than $9 an hour. I want people to make as much as they can,’ Rubio responded to Charlie Rose on CBS’ ‘This Morning.’ But he continued, ‘I don’t think a minimum wage law works.’ ‘I want people to make a lot more than $9,’ he said. ‘Nine dollars is not enough. The problem is that you can’t do that by mandating it in the minimum wage laws. Minimum wage laws have never worked in terms of helping the middle class attain more prosperity.’” [Huffington Post, 2/13/13]
Ted Cruz: “Big picture, I’m a flat tax guy.” ”CRUZ: Big picture, I’m a flat tax guy. Low and simple. Now, that’s not easy to do. A lot of forces in Washington, a lot of lobbyists don’t want it.” [MSNBC’s Morning Joe, 3/17/15]
Wonkblog: Ted Cruz’s “flat tax” proposal was a “colossal giveaway to the rich.” “Imagine there’s no IRS. It isn’t hard to do. No Obamacare to pay for. And no budget deficits too. Imagine all the people, living with a flat tax. You may say Ted Cruz is a dreamer, but he’s not the only one. He hopes some day—especially if you live in Iowa—you’ll join him, and, well, he’ll be president. […] But reality is a lot tougher than some tax models. A flat tax would just be a colossal giveaway to the rich—and maybe even take away for the poor—and that doesn’t help the economy much.” [Washington Post, 3/24/15]
Ted Cruz opposed raising the minimum wage. According to CBS News, “Students asked Sen. Cruz for his thoughts on immigration reform, Russia, ways to get the GOP vote and minimum wage. On the subject of minimum wage Sen. Cruz says that he feels jobs would be eliminated by the minimum wage hike. He says he doesn’t think it’s a good idea.” [CBS News, 4/2/14]
Carly Fiorina opposed raising the federal minimum wage. “Ms. Fiorina generally believes that reducing government regulations helps to spur the economy, and she opposed the 2009 federal stimulus program as a wasteful use of taxpayer money. She opposes raising the federal minimum wage, saying doing so ‘will hurt those who are looking for entry-level jobs.’” [New York Times, 5/4/15]
Mike Huckabee: Trickle-down economics were “largely true.” “One often hears of ‘trickle-down economics,’ a popular conservative notion that when the economy for the top earners in our society gets better, the effect will ‘trickle down’ to the rest of the people. That’s largely true.” [God, Guns, Grits and Gravy, p. 145, 2015]
Mike Huckabee’s tax plan was criticized by economists for potentially raising rates on the poor. “Mike Huckabee has a counter offer to Jeb Bush’s promise to bring the economy back to 4% growth: 6%. ‘I believe we can get it to 6 or higher with a fair tax. I’m convinced,’ Huckabee told a crowd of potential caucus-goers at the Iowa State Fair on Thursday. ‘I guarantee you we will goose the economy if you bring $11 trillion of working capital back to this country.’ The former Arkansas governor and GOP presidential candidate has argued for overhauling the tax code by abolishing the IRS, which he called on Sunday a ‘criminal enterprise,’ and establishing a single, flat sales tax across the board — a proposal that has drawn heat from some economists who say it would unfairly burden the poor, a claim Huckabee rejects.” [CNN, 8/13/15]
Mike Huckabee called the minimum wage “a government intrusion.” “Many of the Republican candidates for president have spoken out against raising the minimum wage… Mike Huckabee, considered something of an economic populist for his support of preserving entitlements, has come out against an increase, calling it a government intrusion.” [New York Times, 5/8/15]
Rand Paul’s tax plan “would raise taxes on those at the bottom, unless they’re married with a couple of kids, and dramatically reduce taxes on the top.” “Paul would apply a 14.5% flat tax to everything: ‘personal income, including wages, salaries, dividends, capital gains, rents and interest,’ as well as corporations. It would do away entirely with the gift and estate taxes, all tariffs, and payroll taxes. On the plus side, he would exempt the first $50,000 in income for families of four and retain the earned-income tax credit. […] The plan would raise taxes on those at the bottom, unless they’re married with a couple of kids, and dramatically reduce taxes on the top. Yes, corporations and rich people use all sorts of loopholes and deductions to pay lower effective tax rates. But responsible tax reform proposals that lower rates while simplifying the tax code generally try to come up with a number in the middle. This one just brings the marginal rates all the way down to Mitt Romney’s effective tax rate, which was pretty clearly determined in the 2012 election to be too low.” [Salon, 6/18/15]
Rand Paul opposed increasing the minimum wage. “Senators Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio oppose the president’s plan to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 from the $7.25 it’s at now. But should the federal government set a minimum wage at all? […] The line drew big applause but didn’t answer the question—which Karl tried to call him on. So should there be any minimum wage? Paul said, ‘Minimum wage is only harmful when it’s above the market wage.’” [Bloomberg, 1/26/15]
John Kasich pushed an Ohio tax plan that a Republican lawmaker described as a “regressive” proposal that raised “taxes on the poor and middle class.” “Gov. John Kasich touted his budget plan in Dayton on Tuesday, saying that income tax cuts and exempting some small businesses from income taxes will drive innovation in Ohio and create jobs. […] Meanwhile, lawmakers in Columbus began taking aim at some of Kasich’s tax proposals, which calls for offsetting a huge income tax cut with increases in sales taxes, cigarette taxes, oil and gas drilling taxes and the Commercial Activities Tax on businesses’ gross receipts. Ohio House Rep. Niraj Antani, R-Miamisburg, said much of Kasich’s plan is ‘laudable’ but he called the sales tax ‘regressive’ and said the severance tax increases could lead to job losses at oil companies already coping with declining oil revenue. Antani also said he is concerned about ‘tax shifting,’ where one tax goes down but others go up. ‘To pay for (a tax cut) we don’t raise taxes on the poor and the middle class,’ said Antani. ‘We do it by cutting spending.’” [Dayton Daily News, 2/3/15]
John Kasich pushed an Ohio budget plan that a Republican lawmaker described as a “regressive” proposal that raised “taxes on the poor and middle class.” “Gov. John Kasich touted his budget plan in Dayton on Tuesday, saying that income tax cuts and exempting some small businesses from income taxes will drive innovation in Ohio and create jobs. […] Meanwhile, lawmakers in Columbus began taking aim at some of Kasich’s tax proposals, which calls for offsetting a huge income tax cut with increases in sales taxes, cigarette taxes, oil and gas drilling taxes and the Commercial Activities Tax on businesses’ gross receipts. Ohio House Rep. Niraj Antani, R-Miamisburg, said much of Kasich’s plan is ‘laudable’ but he called the sales tax ‘regressive’ and said the severance tax increases could lead to job losses at oil companies already coping with declining oil revenue. Antani also said he is concerned about ‘tax shifting,’ where one tax goes down but others go up. ‘To pay for (a tax cut) we don’t raise taxes on the poor and the middle class,’ said Antani. ‘We do it by cutting spending.’” [Dayton Daily News, 2/3/15]
John Kasich opposed raising the minimum wage. “KASICH: […] I am not personally in favor of raising the minimum wage for this reason: If you talk to business people, people who put a payroll together — I’ve never put a payroll together, that’s why I’m leaving politics, so I can do it — they say that if the minimum wage goes up they’re going to have to raise all other wages in their businesses, and the people it’s going to hurt the most are the poorest people, are the least skilled people that work for them.” [CNN, 9/2/00]
Chris Christie pushed to cut the income tax rate for the wealthiest Americans by 11 percent and lower the corporate tax rate by 10 percent. “Christie suggested halving the number of income tax brackets down to three from six rates and lowering the top tax rate to 28% down from the current maximum rate of 39% for the wealthiest Americans. […] The New Jersey governor also proposed reducing the corporate tax rate to 25% from today’s 35% high, arguing that reducing the rate will attract businesses and incentivize companies to stay in the U.S.” [CNN, 5/12/15]
As governor, Chris Christie pushed tax cuts that “would largely benefit [New Jersey’s] wealthier residents.” “Gov. Chris Christie’s proposal to cut income taxes by 10 percent would provide only modest financial relief to middle-class families who are struggling more under the weight of their property taxes, according to analysis by the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services. The governor’s plan would largely benefit the state’s wealthier residents, who pay a significantly higher rate under the state’s current progressive tax system, and so they would see greater savings, the analysis shows.” [Star-Ledger, 1/31/12]
Chris Christie said he was “tired of hearing about the minimum wage.” “New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) said Tuesday that he’s ‘tired’ of hearing discussion on the minimum wage and seemed to suggest that a higher minimum wage isn’t something to ‘aspire to.’ ‘I gotta tell you the truth, I’m tired of hearing about the minimum wage, I really am,’ Christie said during an event at the Chamber of Commerce in Washington, according to a recording of his remarks by the liberal opposition research group American Bridge. ‘I don’t think there’s a mother or father sitting around a kitchen table tonight in America who are saying, ‘You know honey, if my son or daughter could just make a higher minimum wage, my God, all our dreams would be realized,’ he added. ‘Is that what parents aspire to for their children?’” [Talking Points Memo, 10/21/14]
Rick Santorum proposed a tax plan that cut taxes for the top one percent by an average of 13.6%, while the bottom 20 percent would only receive a 0.3% cut on average. “Under the Santorum plan, the richer you are, the more you save. Taxpayers in the lowest 20% of earners would receive an average tax cut of $255, a tax rate reduction of 0.3%. Meanwhile, individuals in the top 20% of earners would get a tax cut averaging more than $29,000, a rate reduction of almost 10%. And the 1%? They’d get an average cut of $263,000, or 13.6%.” [CNN Money, 1/18/12]
Bobby Jindal opposed raising the minimum wage nationally and in Louisiana. “Jindal said he would not be in favor raising the minimum wage nationally or in Louisiana at this time because the country’s economy isn’t strong enough. Both the U.S. Congress and the Louisiana State Legislature are considering increases to the lowest possible wage this spring.” [Times-Picayune, 2/26/14]
Lindsey Graham said it was “stupid” to allow tax cuts for the wealthy to expire. “South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Sunday said President Barack Obama’s plan to let tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire was ‘stupid.’ During an interview on CNN, host Candy Crowley asked Graham if he would be willing to raise taxes on the middle class if Democrats refused to extend tax cuts for people making over $250,000. ‘I’m not going to do a short-term thing that’s stupid,’ the South Carolina Republican remarked.” [Raw Story, 8/5/12]
“As the son of an immigrant family, I am happy to be a guest in this country, which was largely built by such families.”
– Pope Francis, 9/23/15
Donald Trump opposed a pathway to citizenship. “Trump said Wednesday in an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash that as president he would deport all undocumented immigrants and then allow the ‘good ones’ to reenter the country through an ‘expedited process’ and live in the U.S. legally, though not as citizens. ‘Legal status,’ Trump suggested. ‘We got to move ‘em out, we’re going to move ‘em back in if they’re really good people.’” [CNN, 7/30/15]
Donald Trump on undocumented immigrants: “They have to go.” “Donald Trump would reverse President Obama’s executive orders on immigration and deport all undocumented immigrants from the U.S. as president, he said in an exclusive interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd. ‘We’re going to keep the families together, but they have to go,’ he said in the interview, which aired in full on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ Sunday. Pressed on what he’d do if the immigrants in question had nowhere to return to, Trump reiterated: ‘They have to go.’ ‘We will work with them. They have to go. Chuck, we either have a country, or we don’t have a country,’ he said.” [NBC News, 8/16/15]
Donald Trump made ending birthright citizenship a pillar of his immigration plan, calling it “the biggest magnet for illegal immigration.” “End birthright citizenship. This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration. By a 2:1 margin, voters say it’s the wrong policy, including Harry Reid who said ‘no sane country’ would give automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.” [“Immigration Reform That Will Make America Great Again,” accessed 8/20/15]
Donald Trump: “I’ll use the word anchor baby.” REPORTER: Anchor baby, that’s an offensive term, people find that hurtful TRUMP: You mean it’s not political correct and yet everybody uses it? REPORTER: Look it up in the dictionary, it’s offensive. TRUMP: Give me a different term, give me a different term. What else would you like to say. REPORTER: A child, an American born child of an undocumented immigrant. TRUMP: You want me to say that, okay, I use the word anchor baby. Excuse me, I’ll use the word anchor baby.” [ABC News, 8/19/15]
Ben Carson opposed a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. “People already here illegally could apply for guest-worker status from outside of the country. This means they would have to leave first. They should in no way be rewarded for having broken our laws, but if they are wise, they will arrange with their employer before they leave to immediately offer them a legal job as soon as their application is received.” [Ben Carson, National Review, 11/12/14]
Ben Carson on the term “anchor babies” and birthright citizenship: “It doesn’t make any sense to me that people could come in here, have a baby and that baby becomes an American citizen.” “The neurosurgeon outlined his views on the topic at a rally in Phoenix on Tuesday. ‘I know the 14th Amendment has brought up recently, about anchor babies—and it doesn’t make any sense to me that people could come in here, have a baby and that baby becomes an American citizen. There are many countries in the world where they simply have recognized that and don’t allow that to occur,’ Carson said.” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Jeb Bush, when asked if he supported a pathway to citizenship: “No.” “During an interview Wednesday with the New Hampshire Union Leader in Manchester, Mr. Bush was asked whether he supported a pathway to full citizenship. He replied, ‘No.’ ‘What do we do with the 11 million people here? I think the answer is earned legal status,’ he said.” [Washington Times, 7/8/15]
Jeb Bush said Pres. Obama’s executive order stopping the deportation of DREAMers was “way beyond the purview of executive power.” “Bush also offered a stern rebuke to Obama on immigration, and accused him of playing politics. Earlier this summer, the president signed an executive order that stopped the deportation of certain young illegal immigrants. Bush said he saw Obama’s action as a way of undercutting Romney and winning good will from Hispanic voters, not as an effective piece of policy. ‘This is so cynical. And he – I mean, if you’re, if you, if the law says clearly that you have a case-by-case right to review cases, and you blanket say 800,000 people comply, that is way beyond the purview of executive power,’ Bush said.” [Washington Post, 8/30/12]
Jeb Bush called American citizens born to undocumented immigrants “anchor babies.” “Jeb Bush doesn’t want birthright citizenship to go away, but he is calling for stronger enforcement for people who abuse it. ‘If there’s abuse, if people are bringing — pregnant women are coming in to have babies simply because they can do it, then there ought to be greater enforcement,’ Bush said on Bill Bennett’s conservative radio show, ‘Morning in America’ Wednesday. ‘That’s [the] legitimate side of this. Better enforcement so that you don’t have these, you know, ‘anchor babies’, as they’re described, coming into the country.’ ‘Anchor babies’ is a derogatory term used to describe children who are born in the United States to undocumented parents.” [Politico, 8/19/15]
Marco Rubio flip flopped to oppose his own comprehensive immigration reform bill. “Back in April, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., stood before cameras with the bipartisan ‘Gang of Eight’ and joked he wasn’t quite sure he was ready to sign onto their comprehensive immigration reform plan. ‘Actually, I changed my mind,’ Rubio joked to laughter as he pretended to walk away from the podium. ‘No, I’m kidding.’ But fast forward four months after the bill he helped craft passed the Senate, and Rubio’s not joking anymore. Instead of advocating for the comprehensive bill he signed onto, Rubio’s now saying a piecemeal approach is more ‘realistic.’ As first reported by Breitbart News, a spokesman for Rubio said ‘a series of individual bills’ on immigration reform may be more practical than comprehensive immigration reform at this time.” [ABC News, 10/28/13]
Marco Rubio opposed the DREAM Act and said it went too far. “Senator Rubio went as far as to address the DREAM Act that protested him moments earlier. He even appeared, somewhat surprisingly, sympathetic to them. He said he understood their circumstances and agreed that something should be done to address the plight of those who came to this country as children and have excelled in either education or the military. This observer, was virtually holding his breath, as some might have expected Rubio to then proclaim his support for the DREAM Act, but alas, he did not. He stated that the current bills before Congress, i.e., the DREAM Act, went too far.” [The Huffington Post, Ediberto Roman, 1/27/12]
Marco Rubio said he was “open to exploring ways” to limit birthright citizenship in the United States. “Marco Rubio, who is running for president thanks to birthright citizenship, says he is open to the idea of ending it for children who were born in the United States to foreign parents. ‘I’m not in favor of repealing the 14th Amendment,’ Rubio said during a Tuesday news conference at the rain-soaked Iowa State Fair. ‘But I am open to exploring ways of not allowing people who are coming here deliberately for that purpose to acquire citizenship.’” [National Journal, 8/18/15]
2010: Marco Rubio said a path to citizenship was “code for amnesty.” “As in previous debates, Rubio differed with Crist and Meek on immigration. He said the ‘pathway to citizenship’ favored by Meek and ‘earned path’ favored by Crist are ‘basically code for amnesty.’ Rubio said he doesn’t favor mass deportations of people in the country illegally. He said that after the U.S. secures its borders it can set up a system, and then people without documents ‘will be able to leave this country, return to their homeland, and try to reenter through our system that now functions, a system that makes sense.” [Palm Beach Post, 10/25/10]
2013: Marco Rubio: “What I’ve never been for is a special pathway to citizenship.” “What I’ve never been for is a special pathway to citizenship. Let me just remind everybody there is no such thing as a path to citizenship. You can’t go from being an immigrant to a citizen. You have to go to get a green card first. […] That’s been my position. It’s not to have a special pathway to green card citizenship or anything else because it is unfair to the people that are doing the right way and it would incentivize illegal immigration in the future. That’s been my position all along. We’re not going do special pathways that discourage people from doing it the right way.” [The Lead with Jake Tapper, 3/19/13]
June 2015: Marco Rubio: “I do” support a pathway to citizenship. “Many conservatives — and, indeed, many people — have been confused about what, exactly, Marco Rubio’s position is on immigration now that he’s said he regrets his support for the failed Gang of Eight bill. In an interview with New Hampshire’s local ABC station on Friday, Rubio made clear that he remains a supporter of a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. ‘I do,’ Rubio said, when asked if he supports a path to citizenship for those currently in the United States illegally. First, though, Rubio said lawmakers have to ‘prove to the American people that illegal immigration is under control,’ implement an e-verify system, and modernize our legal immigration system.” [National Review, 6/30/15]
September 2015: Marco Rubio ruled out a path to citizenship during his presidency. “Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio has effectively ruled out granting legal status to undocumented immigrants if he makes it to the White House, even for a second term. Pressed by conservative host Sean Hannity during a Monday night interview on Fox News, the Florida senator said he’s open to a path to citizenship for people in the U.S. illegally, but only a decade or more after passage of bills to secure the border and modernize the legal immigration system. ‘I don’t think it’s a decision you have to make on the front end. The first two things you have to do is stop illegal immigration, then second you have to modernize our legal immigration system, and then third you can have a debate about how to even legalize people to begin with,’ Rubio said. ‘And then ultimately in 10 or 12 years you could have a broader debate about how has this worked out and should we allow some of them to apply for green cards and eventually citizenship.’” [Bloomberg, 9/22/15]
Ted Cruz opposed the DREAM Act. “Let’s start with how Cruz, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate, stands on the cited act. We didn’t have to look far. In a transcribed interview with blogger Sonja Harris of Conservatives in Action that Cruz has on his campaign website, the candidate says: ‘I do not support the DREAM Act and categorically oppose amnesty. I categorically oppose amnesty, and I strongly support legal immigration for those that have followed the rules and come here to pursue the American dream.’” [PolitiFact, 2/21/12]
Ted Cruz: “I think a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is profoundly unfair.” “Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said Sunday that a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would be unfair to those who have legally immigrated to the United States. ‘I think a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is profoundly unfair to the millions of legal immigrants who followed the rules,’ Cruz said during an interview for ABC’s ‘This Week.’ Cruz added that he does not think a bill with such a path can pass the Republican-controlled House.” [Washington Post, 7/21/13]
Ted Cruz opposed comprehensive immigration reform, saying it would be “kicking millions of Americans in the teeth.” “Speaking with Houston-based radio host Michael Berry, Cruz said he hopes that Speaker John Boehner will not take on immigration reform next year. Doing so, Cruz argued, would diminish the ‘incredible opportunity to retake the Senate in 2014.’ Cruz emphasized that he is focused on winning the Senate majority from Democrats, and said passing immigration reform legislation would be the ‘number one thing Republicans could do to mess that up.’ Cruz also said comprehensive immigration would amount to ‘kicking millions of Americans in the teeth.’” [The Nation, 12/23/13]
Ted Cruz said the Constitution should “absolutely” be changed to end birthright citizenship. “When the Texas senator was asked Wednesday on the Michael Medved show if the 14th Amendment should be changed, Cruz answered ‘absolutely.’ ‘We should end granting automatic birthright citizenship to the children of those who are here illegally,’ he said.” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Carly Fiorina opposed a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. “If Carly Fiorina becomes president, the immigrants currently in the country illegally would face an additional hurdle in their quest for U.S. citizenship. During a wide-ranging interview with Yahoo’s Katie Couric, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO was asked if she favored providing a path to citizenship for the roughly 11 million immigrants in the country illegally. ‘I do not. Not for those who came here illegally and who have stayed here illegally,’ said Fiorina, who announced her candidacy for the Republican nomination earlier in the day.” [Bloomberg, 5/4/15]
Carly Fiorina did not support comprehensive immigration reform. “But [Fiorina] also broke with members in both parties who believe a comprehensive immigration package is needed to address the problem. ‘So then Barbara Boxer, President Obama, say, ‘oh my gosh, we have to have comprehensive immigration reform.’ You don’t need comprehensive immigration reform to secure the border. And you don’t need comprehensive immigration reform to have a temporary worker program that works. Those are responsibilities of the federal government that they have today and they are failing at those responsibilities,’ she said.” [Politico, 5/1/10]
Mike Huckabee said he was open to ending birthright citizenship. “Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee said Friday that he was open to laws that would end the ‘birthright’ citizenship granted to children by the 14th Amendment, joining several other GOP candidates in endorsing the idea. The comments came in an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, who asked the question twice to be clear that Huckabee really would ‘abrogate’ that right. ‘I would,’ said Huckabee, ‘because I think that when we see advertisements in China, advertising essentially ‘birth tourism,’ where people are able to purchase packages so they fly to the U.S., have their baby in the U.S. so it has dual citizenship – these aren’t people who are impoverished, looking for a Medicaid payment. These are very wealthy people who are coming here so their child will in essence be put a foot down and say ‘I have American citizenship.’” [Washington Post, 8/28/15]
Mike Huckabee on immigration: “If you’re rewarding people who play outside the rules, and punish people who live within the rules, pretty soon nobody is going to play by the rules.” “In April, during the lead up to the launch of his presidential bid, Mike Huckabee’s political action committee released a web ad on immigration. The ad features a farmer from Texas, who warns that an open border has let in ‘the drug runners, the terrorists, the human traffickers.’ In the video, Huckabee says, ‘We’ve got to repeal Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders, oppose amnesty and secure the border. You don’t punish people for living by the rules. If you’re rewarding people who play outside the rules, and punish people who live within the rules, pretty soon nobody is going to play by the rules.’” [Buzzfeed, 7/28/15]
Rand Paul supported legislation ending the President’s program to defer deportation for undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said in an interview published Thursday that he supports legislation ending the president’s program to defer deportation for undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. Speaking to Breitbart News during a medical mission in Guatemala, Paul lent his backing to House Republican efforts to address the crisis of unaccompanied minors crossing the southern U.S. border. ‘I’m supportive of the House bill and I think it will go a long way to fixing the problem,’ Paul said. ‘But like everything else, nothing good has happened because Sen. Reid has decided that he’s not going to allow any votes on any bills this year because he’s protecting his members who are vulnerable in the election — he’s protecting them from any kind of votes. So I think there’s a very good chance the House bill could pass in the Senate, but it won’t ever pass if it doesn’t ever see the light of day.’” [Huffington Post, 8/21/14]
Rand Paul introduced an amendment to remove a pathway to citizenship from immigration reform legislation. “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an amendment Thursday to the Senate immigration bill that would effectively strip the bill’s path to citizenship and require illegal immigrants to apply through regular channels. The ‘No New Pathway to Citizenship Act’ amendment would allow illegal immigrants to remain in the United States as Registered Provisional Immigrants — a new work visa category — but force them to apply as though they were still in their home country.” [Washington Post, 6/20/13]
Rand Paul introduced legislation to end birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants. “In 2011, the Kentucky senator joined forces with Louisiana Senator David Vitter to introduce a resolution to ensure ‘a person born in the United States to illegal aliens does not automatically gain citizenship.’ ‘Citizenship is a privilege, and only those who respect our immigration laws should be allowed to enjoy its benefits,’ Paul said at the time. ‘This legislation makes it necessary that everyone follow the rules, and goes through the same process to become a U.S. citizen.’” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
John Kasich was a longtime supporter of amending the constitution to end birthright citizenship for undocumented immigrants. “While Strickland and Kasich agree that Ohio should not enact an immigration law similar to Arizona’s, they clash on related issues. The governor would maintain birthright citizenship for children born here to illegal immigrants. Kasich, a former Fox News commentator, has been a longtime supporter of amending the Constitution to end the automatic right.” [Columbus Dispatch, 9/26/10]
Chris Christie: “This path to citizenship stuff is garbage.” ”New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) said on Tuesday the idea of granting undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship — one he supported in 2010 — ‘is garbage.’ Instead, the 2016 candidate said at a campaign stop in New Hampshire, cracking down on businesses that hire immigrants who are here illegally is the best way to solve the problem. ‘I met lots of undocumented folks in my state over the course of my time as governor, I can tell you not one of them has ever said to me that they had come here to vote. This path to citizenship stuff is garbage,’ Christie said. ‘That’s not why they’re coming. They’re coming to work and support their family.’” [Talking Points Memo, 8/4/15]
Chris Christie: Birthright citizenship “may have made sense at some point in our history, right now, we need to relook at all that.” “Christie, speaking on Aug. 12—about a week before Trump’s proposal —was asked about birthright citizenship during a radio appearance with conservative host Laura Ingraham and said the matter deserves another look. ‘I think all this stuff needs to be reexamined in light of the current circumstances,’ New Jersey’s governor said. ‘The fact is the American immigration system is not working right now, it’s not working for the American people, it’s not working for our economy, and all these things need to be reexamined in light of the current circumstances. And while [birthright citizenship] may have made sense at some point in our history, right now, we need to relook at all that. And it has to be relooked at in respect to the rule of law.’” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Chris Christie pulled “support for a bill that would grant in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants” after he was re-elected. “New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie denied Monday that he flip-flopped on his position before and after his landslide re-election victory on an important immigration issue in the state. The New Jersey Star-Ledger hit Christie in a scathing op-ed for pulling support for a bill that would grant in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants, but Christie said he has not, instead it is just aspects of the legislation that he disagrees with. ‘I said the legislature should move in the lame duck session towards tuition equality in New Jersey. Period,’ Christie said at a news conference. ‘That’s what I said. I didn’t support any particular piece of legislation. And I still support tuition equality.” [ABC News, 12/2/13]
Rick Santorum opposed a path to citizenship. “Along with Cruz, Rick Santorum is a strident opponent of a general pathway to citizenship. ‘The idea that there are Republicans in Washington, D.C., who are going to say, ‘Well, the rule of law isn’t that important, the idea of people coming into this country who have done so illegally and we’re going to basically treat them the same as people who came here legally,’ is just not going to go over well in a Republican primary,’ Santorum told Fox’s Andrea Tantaros in 2013.” [National Journal, 2/23/15]
Rick Santorum: “Enticements to illegal immigration, such as birthright citizenship, should be ended.” “Other enticements to illegal immigration, such as birthright citizenship, should be ended. Only children born on American soil where at least one parent is a citizen or resident aliens is automatically a U.S. citizen. Of developed countries other than the United States, only Canada has birthright citizenship.” [Rick Santorum op-ed, Breitbart, 5/6/15]
Rick Santorum labeled immigration reform legislation as “amnesty.” “‘We don’t have to talk about immigration. If we do, you know what we should talk about? How immigration is suppressing their wages and keeping their wages down and not allowing them and their family the opportunity to rise in America,’ he added. He said the GOP doesn’t have to endorse ‘bringing in two and a half million people a year and give amnesty to 13 million people,’ alluding to the reforms of the comprehensive legislation that passed the Senate last year.” [The Hill, 7/14/14]
Bobby Jindal supported ending birthright citizenship in the United States. “Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has joined front-running GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump in calling for an end to automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to illegal immigrants. ‘We need to end birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants,’ Jindal tweeted Monday night, a day after Trump offered a tough plan to combat what he calls the negative economic consequences of illegal immigration. Jindal is also running for president, though he remains near the bottom of the 17-person GOP field.” [Times-Picayune, 8/18/15]
Bobby Jindal said he was “happy” to use the term “anchor baby” and that “folks today are too easily offended.” “HEMMER: But, you’ll use anchor baby, right, as a phrase? JINDAL: Yeah look, I think folks today are too easily offended. They are too politically correct. The real issue here is, yeah I’m happy to use the term, but the reality is, the real issue here is when you secure our border. The bigger frustration from the American people. It doesn’t seem to matter who is in charge in D.C. secure the borders. Stop illegal immigration.” [Fox News, 8/20/15]
Bobby Jindal said the U.S. did not need comprehensive immigration reform. “Jindal, making his third trip to Iowa in the past year, spent the majority of his speech focusing on the American dream, and linking it to his personal story. He drew laughs at several points during his remarks as he made jabs at President Barack Obama. ‘How many moms and dads have told their little children, ‘anybody can grow up to become President of the United States’? Now, unfortunately, we learned how true that was in 2012 and 2008,’ the Louisiana governor said. Jindal, who is from the South, also had harsh words about the ongoing immigration problem. ‘I have a very simple message for the president of the United States: We don’t need a comprehensive bill, we don’t need another thousand page bill. He simply needs to man up. He needs to secure the border; he needs to get it done today. No more excuses. No more delays,’ Jindal said.” [NBC News, 8/10/14]
Lindsey Graham: “I think it’s a bad practice to give citizenship based on birth.” “Graham, one of Trump’s most outspoken critics, took a more nuanced approach on Monday to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. ‘I don’t mind changing the law,’ the South Carolina senator said. ‘I think it’s a bad practice to give citizenship based on birth. We have evidence of people buying tourist visas for the express purpose of coming over here and having a child as birth tourism. I don’t think that’s a good idea. But that’s not going to happen until we fix a broken immigration system.’” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Lindsay Graham: “We should change our Constitution and say if you come here illegally and you have a child, that child’s automatically not a citizen.” “Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says that the United States should end its policy of guaranteeing citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants as ensured by the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The South Carolina Senator defined his stance on the immigration issue on Wednesday in an interview with Fox News host Greta Van Susteren. ‘Birthright citizenship I think is a mistake,’ explained Graham. ‘We should change our Constitution and say if you come here illegally and you have a child, that child’s automatically not a citizen.’” [Huffington Post, 7/29/10]
“Accepting the urgency, it seems clear to me also that climate change is a problem which can no longer be left to a future generation.”
– Pope Francis, 9/23/ 15
Donald Trump: “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese.” “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” [@realDonaldTrump, 11/6/12, 2:25 p.m. EDT]
Ben Carson: The Earth “may be warming” or “may be cooling.” “Carson, a retired Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon, often talks about his medical background and science during his speeches. Pressed on the fact that the bulk of the scientific community believes the Earth is indeed warming, Carson pivoted. ‘You can ask it several different ways, but my answer is going to be the same,’ he said. ‘We may be warming. We may be cooling.’” [Bloomberg, 11/26/14]
Jeb Bush said he was “tired” of the idea that “science has decided” that climate change is manmade. “It is not unanimous among scientists that it is disproportionately manmade. What I get a little tired of on the left is this idea that somehow science has decided all this so you can’t have a view.” [Huffington Post, 8/24/11]
Marco Rubio denied that human activity was causing climate change. “Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, a GOP star and possible 2016 presidential contender, does not believe human activity is causing climate change, he said Sunday. ‘I do not believe that human activity is causing these dramatic changes to our climate the way these scientists are portraying it,’ Rubio said on ABC’s ‘This Week.’ ‘I do not believe that the laws that they propose we pass will do anything about it, except it will destroy our economy,’ he added.” [Los Angeles Times, 5/11/14]
Ted Cruz said people who believe global warming is real are “the equivalent of the flat-Earthers.” “Cruz, the red-meat Texas senator with an army of conservative followers, raised eyebrows on Tuesday when he told the Texas Tribune that people who believe global warming is real are ‘the equivalent of the flat-Earthers’. ‘It used to be it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier,’ Cruz said.” [Guardian, 3/27/15]
Carly Fiorina: “Companies shouldn’t cave in to the demands of climate-change scientists.” “‘Companies shouldn’t cave in to the demands of climate-change scientists,’ says Fiorina, probably hoping that nobody will point out that she nearly destroyed the last company she led.” [The Stranger, 6/3/15]
Mike Huckabee mocked the Obama Administration’s elevation of climate change as a critical issue. “Huckabee appeared before the Iowa Freedom Summit on Saturday to deliver a biting assessment of President Barack Obama’s policies and make a pitch for his potential candidacy. He recently left a cable news show and is on a book tour. The former Arkansas governor mocked Obama’s elevation of climate change as a critical issue. Huckabee says a greater threat is violent radical elements stoking fear around the world. He says America hasn’t done enough to strike those terror groups.” [Associated Press, 1/25/15]
Rand Paul claimed that the science behind climate change was “not conclusive.” “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said in a recent interview that the science behind climate change is ‘not conclusive,’ calling people who tie extreme weather to a changing climate ignorant.” [The Hill, 4/23/14]
John Kasich said he was not “laying awake at night worrying” about climate change. “‘We are going to continue to work on cleaning coal, but I want to tell you, we are going to dig it, we are going to clean it, and we are going to burn it in Ohio, and we are not going to apologize for it,’ he said during wide-ranging remarks on energy at the conference. Ohio is a coal-producing state and home to American Electric Power, a major coal-burning utility. Asked in a subsequent interview if he was concerned about the GOP’s efforts to kill EPA rules, he said, ‘I believe there is something to [climate change], but to be unilaterally doing everything here while China and India are belching and putting us in a noncompetitive position isn’t good, but some of that is the presidential leadership,’ Kasich said. ‘I am just saying that I am concerned about it, but I am not laying awake at night worrying the sky is falling. I just have a concern about it,’ he added.” [The Hill, 5/2/12]
Chris Christie refused “to rejoin a regional cap-and trade program to combat climate change.” “Gov. Chris Christie is coming under fire for refusing to rejoin a regional cap-and trade program to combat climate change that his state withdrew from three years ago. The move — highlighted last week by The New York Times — has opponents charging that the Republican governor doesn’t want to alienate conservatives in advance of a potential 2016 presidential bid. ‘It’s all because of a four letter word: K-O-C-H,’ said Democratic state Sen. Bob Smith, the chairman of the state’s Environment and Energy Committee, referring to the billionaire Koch brothers who bankroll many GOP campaigns, and who favor conservative stances on environmental issues. ‘They don’t want to see any candidates for president who have the slightest green tint to them. If the governor was green at all, he would lose their support.’” [MSNBC, 9/23/14]
Rick Santorum called the idea that humans are causing climate change “patently absurd.” “Appearing Wednesday on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show, the former Pennsylvania GOP senator jumped at the chance to distinguish himself from his Massachusetts rival by displaying his climate skeptic credentials. ‘I believe the earth gets warmer and I also believe the earth gets cooler,’ Santorum said. ‘And I think history points out that it does that and that the idea that man, through the production of CO2 — which is a trace gas in the atmosphere, and the man-made part of that trace gas is itself a trace gas — is somehow responsible for climate change is, I think, just patently absurd when you consider all the other factors, El Niño, La Niña, sunspots, moisture in the air. There’s a variety of factors that contribute to the Earth warming and cooling.’” [Politico, 6/9/11]
Bobby Jindal took positions “directly at odds with environmentalists” on climate change. “On climate change, Mr. Jindal takes positions directly at odds with environmentalists—and, likely, with whoever becomes the Democratic presidential nominee—by questioning the role humans play in global warming and calling on the U.S. to withdraw from climate talks led by the United Nations.” [Wall Street Journal, 10/15/14]
“The efforts which were recently made to mend broken relationships and to open new doors to cooperation within our human family represent positive steps along the path of reconciliation, justice and freedom.”
– Pope Francis, 9/23/15
Ben Carson said he would roll back Pres. Obama’s agreement to normalize diplomatic relations with Cuba. “Senator Rubio says he will block the confirmation of an ambassador to Cuba by the Senate. Both he and Governor Bush (along with fellow presidential candidates Ben Carson and Mike Huckabee who now also live in Florida), say that if they are elected president they will seek to roll back President Obama’s agreement with Cuba.” [Baltimore Sun, 8/23/15]
Jeb Bush said that normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba was “capitulating to our adversaries.” “Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is blasting the Obama administration’s decision to formally remove Cuba from its list of state sponsors of terrorism. ‘Neither continued repression at home nor Cuba’s destabilizing activities abroad appear sufficient to stop President Obama from making further concessions to the Communist regime in Havana,’ Bush said in a statement Friday. ‘Today’s news is further evidence that President Obama seems more interested in capitulating to our adversaries than in confronting them. Iran’s leaders are surely taking note.’ ‘The removal of Cuba from the State Sponsors of Terrorism List and the unilateral concessions to Havana, before it changes its authoritarian ways and stops denying the Cuban people their basic human rights, is a mistake,’ he added. ‘I call on Congress to keep pressure on Cuba and hold the Administration accountable.’” [Washington Post, 5/29/15]
Marco Rubio opposed the restoration of diplomatic ties between the United States and Cuba. “The addition of Rubio to the Republican race would bring President Barack Obama’s ongoing thaw in relations to the center stage of American presidential politics. The son of Cuban immigrants, Rubio is opposed to the restoration of diplomatic ties between Washington and Havana. It’s perhaps no accident that his announcement comes just days after Obama and Cuban President Raúl Castro shook hands at the opening of the Summit of the Americas last Friday, an important symbolic gesture as the two sides try to normalize formal relations.” [Foreign Policy, 4/13/15]
Ted Cruz opposed normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba. “Hours after his Senate colleague and fellow Cuban-American Marco Rubio criticized President Obama’s change in U.S. policy on Cuba, Ted Cruz broke his silence on the news with a bang, calling the decision ‘a tragic mistake.’ The Republican senator from Texas told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto on Wednesday afternoon that because of the American embargo and diplomatic freeze-out, Cuba had been ‘gasping for air.’ Now, though, Obama’s policy shift would have devastating effects. ‘Just like the administration did with Iran, right when the [Iranian] administration was feeling the maximum pain, [Obama] throws them an economic lifeline and continues the brutal repression and dictatorship of the Castro brothers,’ said Cruz, whose father emigrated from Cuba in 1957, four years before the U.S. imposed a strict trade embargo on the country. When Cavuto pointed out that more than five decades of the same policy hadn’t been very effective, Cruz demurred. ‘What it has wrought is limiting the impact and harm of Cuba,’ he said.” [National Journal, 12/17/14]
Carly Fiorina opposed the agreement to normalize diplomatic relations with Cuba. “Fiorina also took time to jab President Obama on foreign policy, suggesting that he has continued to reward bad behavior in his nuclear negotiations with Iran and by removing Cuba from the terror watch list. She said Cuba hasn’t done anything to deserve this, adding that oppression and suppression have gotten worse.” [Breitbart, 4/20/15]
Mike Huckabee opposed normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba. “GOP presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee gave the Obama administration a kick in the pants over Cuba — and warned the Castro regime would do a lot worse. […] ‘I think we ought to quit pretending that Cuba is some wonderful nation with whom we can sit down and visit with. … They’re not,’ the former Arkansas governor declared.” [New York Daily News, 3/7/15]
Chris Christie said that normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba was a “national disgrace.” “A day after the Obama administration recommended that the U.S. government reverse its long-standing policy designating Cuba a state sponsor of international terrorism, Chris Christie called the move a ‘national disgrace.’ In an appearance today at a town hall meeting in Londonberry, New Hampshire, Christie took aim at President Obama’s diplomatic warming with the Communist nation. ‘It is a national disgrace that the president is engaged in those conversations and even considering taking that country off the terrorist watch-list,’ Christie said.” [ABC News, 4/15/15]
Bobby Jindal denounced the normalization of U.S.-Cuban relations and called on Congress to “do everything it can to stop” it. “With today’s announcement, the President is appeasing a Communist dictatorship headed by the Castro brothers that takes political prisoners and completely disregards basic human dignity. Taking steps to normalize relations with Cuba only serves to reward them, and it is a disservice to those in Cuba who wish to be free and who live in fear of a dictatorial regime. […] Congress should do everything it can to stop the President’s plan of appeasement toward Cuba. We must be willing to stand for freedom around the globe. The safety of the American people depends on it.” [Office of Governor Jindal Press Release, 12/18/14]
Rick Santorum opposed normalizing relations with Cuba, calling it “reckless and not in our nation’s best interest.” “Former Republican Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, said he opposed normalizing trade with Cuba and was ‘extremely concerned with how his release was negotiated.’ He called the president’s foreign policy actions ‘reckless and not in our nation’s best interest.’” [CBS News, 12/18/14]
Lindsey Graham said he would roll back the agreement to normalize diplomatic relations with Cuba. “Graham also said he would roll back another of Obama’s major second-term foreign policy achievements: the normalization of diplomatic ties between the United States and Cuba after nearly six decades of estrangement.” [Yahoo News, 7/15/15]
Lindsey Graham vowed to block funding for an embassy in Cuba. In a tweet, Senator Lindsey Graham wrote, “I will do all in my power to block the use of funds to open an embassy in Cuba. Normalizing relations with Cuba is bad idea at a bad time.” [12/17/14, 12:26 p.m. EDT]
]]>The Republican presidential field is riddled with candidates who have taken extreme and out of touch positions on immigration reform.
2010: Marco Rubio said a path to citizenship was “code for amnesty.” “As in previous debates, Rubio differed with Crist and Meek on immigration. He said the ‘pathway to citizenship’ favored by Meek and ‘earned path’ favored by Crist are ‘basically code for amnesty.’ Rubio said he doesn’t favor mass deportations of people in the country illegally. He said that after the U.S. secures its borders it can set up a system, and then people without documents ‘will be able to leave this country, return to their homeland, and try to reenter through our system that now functions, a system that makes sense.” [Palm Beach Post, 10/25/10]
2010: Marco Rubio said it was “unfair to create an alternate pathway for individuals who entered illegally.” “It was December 2012. The Senate gym. Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) was making the ask. ‘You ought to be a part of this,’ Durbin told Rubio (R-Fla.), as Rubio rode a stationary bike. Durbin and six other senators wanted to rewrite U.S. immigration laws. In the process, they wanted to give illegal immigrants a way to become legal residents and — eventually — citizens. Just two years earlier, Rubio had been against doing that. ‘It is unfair,’ he had said, as a tea party candidate for Senate, ‘to create an alternative pathway for individuals who entered illegally.’” [Washington Post, 4/24/15]
2013: Marco Rubio: “What I’ve never been for is a special pathway to citizenship.” “What I’ve never been for is a special pathway to citizenship. Let me just remind everybody there is no such thing as a path to citizenship. You can’t go from being an immigrant to a citizen. You have to go to get a green card first. What efforts (ph) in the past has done is they’ve awarded people green cards. It’s basically says if you’ve been here for x number of years, we’ll give you a green card. And then once you get a green card, in three to five years, you can apply for citizenship in three to five years. I’m not saying we should do that. On the contrary, I’m saying that all we do is we allow people to earn, to basically apply for and if they qualify, receive a legal status. And then at some point in the future, when some time has elapsed and the security measures are in place, then the only thing people would get is the opportunity to apply for a green card. We wouldn’t award one, either. And then if they were to receive the green card, then of course they can apply for citizenship at some point in the future after that. That’s been my position. It’s not to have a special pathway to green card citizenship or anything else because it is unfair to the people that are doing the right way and it would incentivize illegal immigration in the future. That’s been my position all along. We’re not going do special pathways that discourage people from doing it the right way.” [The Lead with Jake Tapper, 3/19/13]
June 2015: Marco Rubio: “I do” support a pathway to citizenship. “Many conservatives — and, indeed, many people — have been confused about what, exactly, Marco Rubio’s position is on immigration now that he’s said he regrets his support for the failed Gang of Eight bill. In an interview with New Hampshire’s local ABC station on Friday, Rubio made clear that he remains a supporter of a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. ‘I do,’ Rubio said, when asked if he supports a path to citizenship for those currently in the United States illegally. First, though, Rubio said lawmakers have to ‘prove to the American people that illegal immigration is under control,’ implement an e-verify system, and modernize our legal immigration system.” [National Review, 6/30/15]
September 2015: Marco Rubio ruled out a path to citizenship during his presidency. “Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio has effectively ruled out granting legal status to undocumented immigrants if he makes it to the White House, even for a second term. Pressed by conservative host Sean Hannity during a Monday night interview on Fox News, the Florida senator said he’s open to a path to citizenship for people in the U.S. illegally, but only a decade or more after passage of bills to secure the border and modernize the legal immigration system. ‘I don’t think it’s a decision you have to make on the front end. The first two things you have to do is stop illegal immigration, then second you have to modernize our legal immigration system, and then third you can have a debate about how to even legalize people to begin with,’ Rubio said. ‘And then ultimately in 10 or 12 years you could have a broader debate about how has this worked out and should we allow some of them to apply for green cards and eventually citizenship.’” [Bloomberg, 9/22/15]
Donald Trump opposed a pathway to citizenship. “Trump said Wednesday in an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash that as president he would deport all undocumented immigrants and then allow the ‘good ones’ to reenter the country through an ‘expedited process’ and live in the U.S. legally, though not as citizens. ‘Legal status,’ Trump suggested. ‘We got to move ‘em out, we’re going to move ‘em back in if they’re really good people.’” [CNN, 7/30/15]
Donald Trump on undocumented immigrants: “They have to go.” “Donald Trump would reverse President Obama’s executive orders on immigration and deport all undocumented immigrants from the U.S. as president, he said in an exclusive interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd. ‘We’re going to keep the families together, but they have to go,’ he said in the interview, which aired in full on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ Sunday. Pressed on what he’d do if the immigrants in question had nowhere to return to, Trump reiterated: ‘They have to go.’ ‘We will work with them. They have to go. Chuck, we either have a country, or we don’t have a country,’ he said.” [NBC News, 8/16/15]
Ben Carson opposed a pathway to citizenship. “People already here illegally could apply for guest-worker status from outside of the country. This means they would have to leave first. They should in no way be rewarded for having broken our laws, but if they are wise, they will arrange with their employer before they leave to immediately offer them a legal job as soon as their application is received.” [Ben Carson, National Review, 11/12/14]
Jeb Bush, when asked if he supported a pathway to citizenship: “No.” “During an interview Wednesday with the New Hampshire Union Leader in Manchester, Mr. Bush was asked whether he supported a pathway to full citizenship. He replied, ‘No.’ ‘What do we do with the 11 million people here? I think the answer is earned legal status,’ he said.” [Washington Times, 7/8/15]
Jeb Bush reversed from his past support for a pathway to citizenship. “In an apparent reversal from his past statements, former Florida Republican Gov. Jeb Bush said Monday that his immigration reform plan would ‘fall short’ of offering a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants living in the United States — a key provision being put forward by the bipartisan group leading reform efforts on Capitol Hill.” [NBC’s First Read, 3/4/15]
Ted Cruz: “I think a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is profoundly unfair.” “Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said Sunday that a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would be unfair to those who have legally immigrated to the United States. ‘I think a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is profoundly unfair to the millions of legal immigrants who followed the rules,’ Cruz said during an interview for ABC’s ‘This Week.’ Cruz added that he does not think a bill with such a path can pass the Republican-controlled House.” [Washington Post, 7/21/13]
Ted Cruz sponsored an amendment that would prevent undocumented immigrants from gaining citizenship. “Cruz 1322: Ensure that illegal immigrants who are given legal status under this bill are not given a path to citizenship. Providing a path to citizenship undermines the rule of law and is an insult to the millions who have immigrated to the U.S. legally. This Amendment prevents those currently here illegally who are offered legal status under this Act from obtaining citizenship.” [Press Release, Office of Senator Cruz, 6/19/13]
Carly Fiorina opposed a path to citizenship. “If Carly Fiorina becomes president, the immigrants currently in the country illegally would face an additional hurdle in their quest for U.S. citizenship. During a wide-ranging interview with Yahoo’s Katie Couric, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO was asked if she favored providing a path to citizenship for the roughly 11 million immigrants in the country illegally. ‘I do not. Not for those who came here illegally and who have stayed here illegally,’ said Fiorina, who announced her candidacy for the Republican nomination earlier in the day.” [Bloomberg, 5/4/15]
Mike Huckabee on immigration: “If you’re rewarding people who play outside the rules, and punish people who live within the rules, pretty soon nobody is going to play by the rules.” “In April, during the lead up to the launch of his presidential bid, Mike Huckabee’s political action committee released a web ad on immigration. The ad features a farmer from Texas, who warns that an open border has let in ‘the drug runners, the terrorists, the human traffickers.’ In the video, Huckabee says, ‘We’ve got to repeal Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders, oppose amnesty and secure the border. You don’t punish people for living by the rules. If you’re rewarding people who play outside the rules, and punish people who live within the rules, pretty soon nobody is going to play by the rules.’” [Buzzfeed, 7/28/15]
Chris Christie: “This path to citizenship stuff is garbage.” ”New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) said on Tuesday the idea of granting undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship — one he supported in 2010 — ‘is garbage.’ Instead, the 2016 candidate said at a campaign stop in New Hampshire, cracking down on businesses that hire immigrants who are here illegally is the best way to solve the problem. ‘I met lots of undocumented folks in my state over the course of my time as governor, I can tell you not one of them has ever said to me that they had come here to vote. This path to citizenship stuff is garbage,’ Christie said. ‘That’s not why they’re coming. They’re coming to work and support their family.’” [Talking Points Memo, 8/4/15]
Chris Christie said providing a pathway to citizenship was “an extreme way to go.” “Gov. Chris Christie (R-N.J.) is rejecting the idea of providing a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants as ‘extreme,’ reversing his stance ahead of a likely bid for president. ‘That’s an extreme way to go,’ Christie said Monday night in an interview on Fox News’s ‘The Kelly File.’ ‘I don’t believe that’s the way to go and I don’t believe that’s where the American people are.’” [The Hill, 3/19/15]
Rand Paul introduced an amendment to remove a pathway to citizenship from immigration reform. “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an amendment Thursday to the Senate immigration bill that would effectively strip the bill’s path to citizenship and require illegal immigrants to apply through regular channels. The ‘No New Pathway to Citizenship Act’ amendment would allow illegal immigrants to remain in the United States as Registered Provisional Immigrants — a new work visa category — but force them to apply as though they were still in their home country.” [Washington Post, 6/20/13]
Rick Santorum opposed a path to citizenship. “Along with Cruz, Rick Santorum is a strident opponent of a general pathway to citizenship. ‘The idea that there are Republicans in Washington, D.C., who are going to say, ‘Well, the rule of law isn’t that important, the idea of people coming into this country who have done so illegally and we’re going to basically treat them the same as people who came here legally,’ is just not going to go over well in a Republican primary,’ Santorum told Fox’s Andrea Tantaros in 2013.” [National Journal, 2/23/15]
Donald Trump made ending birthright citizenship a pillar of his immigration plan, calling it “the biggest magnet for illegal immigration.” “End birthright citizenship. This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration. By a 2:1 margin, voters say it’s the wrong policy, including Harry Reid who said ‘no sane country’ would give automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants.” [“Immigration Reform That Will Make America Great Again,” accessed 8/20/15]
Donald Trump: “I’ll use the word anchor baby.” REPORTER: Anchor baby, that’s an offensive term, people find that hurtful TRUMP: You mean it’s not political correct and yet everybody uses it? REPORTER: Look it up in the dictionary, it’s offensive. TRUMP: Give me a different term, give me a different term. What else would you like to say. REPORTER: A child, an American born child of an undocumented immigrant. TRUMP: You want me to say that, okay, I use the word anchor baby. Excuse me, I’ll use the word anchor baby.” [ABC News, 8/19/15]
Donald Trump: “Some four million anchor babies are now officially U.S. citizens. This has to stop.” “Some four million anchor babies are now officially U.S. citizens. This has to stop. The only other major country in the world that issues citizenship based on where one’s mother delivers her child is Canada. The rest of the world bases citizenship on who the kid’s parents are, which is of course the only sane standard.” [Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, pg. 141, 2011]
Ben Carson on the term “anchor babies” and birthright citizenship: “It doesn’t make any sense to me that people could come in here, have a baby and that baby becomes an American citizen.” “The neurosurgeon outlined his views on the topic at a rally in Phoenix on Tuesday. ‘I know the 14th Amendment has brought up recently, about anchor babies—and it doesn’t make any sense to me that people could come in here, have a baby and that baby becomes an American citizen. There are many countries in the world where they simply have recognized that and don’t allow that to occur,’ Carson said.” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Jeb Bush called American citizens born to undocumented immigrants “anchor babies.” “Jeb Bush doesn’t want birthright citizenship to go away, but he is calling for stronger enforcement for people who abuse it. ‘If there’s abuse, if people are bringing — pregnant women are coming in to have babies simply because they can do it, then there ought to be greater enforcement,’ Bush said on Bill Bennett’s conservative radio show, ‘Morning in America’ Wednesday. ‘That’s [the] legitimate side of this. Better enforcement so that you don’t have these, you know, ‘anchor babies’, as they’re described, coming into the country.’ ‘Anchor babies’ is a derogatory term used to describe children who are born in the United States to undocumented parents.” [Politico, 8/19/15]
Jeb Bush on the term “anchor babies”: “You give me a better term and I’ll use it.” “A feistier, combative Jeb Bush said Thursday that he doesn’t believe the term ‘anchor babies’ is offensive and blamed Democrats for perpetuating the idea that it’s a loaded term. In one of his most aggressive exchanges with reporters to date, Bush dismissed suggestions that the two-word term deemed offensive by many Hispanics and denounced by Democrats is improper. ‘Do you have a better term? You give me a better term and I’ll use it,’ he snapped at a reporter who asked him.” [Washington Post, 8/20/15]
Jeb Bush on the term “anchor babies”: “Frankly it’s more related to Asian people.” “Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush attempted to clarify his remarks about ‘anchor babies’ during a stop near the U.S. border with Mexico on Monday, saying Asian immigrants are really more of the problem. When asked if he thought his repeated use of the term ‘anchor babies’ – a derogatory term for children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrant parents – Bush said: ‘What I was talking about was the specific case of fraud being committed where there’s organized efforts, and frankly, it’s more related to Asian people coming into our country and having children in that organized effort.’” [Talking Points Memo, 8/24/15]
Ted Cruz said the Constitution should “absolutely” be changed to end birthright citizenship. “When the Texas senator was asked Wednesday on the Michael Medved show if the 14th Amendment should be changed, Cruz answered ‘absolutely.’ ‘We should end granting automatic birthright citizenship to the children of those who are here illegally,’ he said.” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Marco Rubio said he was “open to exploring ways” to limit birthright citizenship in the United States. “Marco Rubio, who is running for president thanks to birthright citizenship, says he is open to the idea of ending it for children who were born in the United States to foreign parents. ‘I’m not in favor of repealing the 14th Amendment,’ Rubio said during a Tuesday news conference at the rain-soaked Iowa State Fair. ‘But I am open to exploring ways of not allowing people who are coming here deliberately for that purpose to acquire citizenship.’” [National Journal, 8/18/15]
Mike Huckabee, according to his top immigration surrogate, proposed amending the Constitution to prevent children of undocumented immigrants from automatically receiving U.S. citizenship. “Mike Huckabee wants to amend the Constitution to prevent children born in the U.S. to illegal aliens from automatically becoming American citizens, according to his top immigration surrogate — a radical step no other major presidential candidate has embraced. Mr. Huckabee, who won last week’s Republican Iowa caucuses, promised Minuteman Project founder James Gilchrist that he would force a test case to the Supreme Court to challenge birthright citizenship, and would push Congress to pass a 28th Amendment to the Constitution to remove any doubt.” [Washington Times, 1/8/08]
Chris Christie: Birthright citizenship “may have made sense at some point in our history, right now, we need to relook at all that.” “Christie, speaking on Aug. 12—about a week before Trump’s proposal —was asked about birthright citizenship during a radio appearance with conservative host Laura Ingraham and said the matter deserves another look. ‘I think all this stuff needs to be reexamined in light of the current circumstances,’ New Jersey’s governor said. ‘The fact is the American immigration system is not working right now, it’s not working for the American people, it’s not working for our economy, and all these things need to be reexamined in light of the current circumstances. And while [birthright citizenship] may have made sense at some point in our history, right now, we need to relook at all that. And it has to be relooked at in respect to the rule of law.’” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Rand Paul introduced legislation to end birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants. “In 2011, the Kentucky senator joined forces with Louisiana Senator David Vitter to introduce a resolution to ensure ‘a person born in the United States to illegal aliens does not automatically gain citizenship.’ ‘Citizenship is a privilege, and only those who respect our immigration laws should be allowed to enjoy its benefits,’ Paul said at the time. ‘This legislation makes it necessary that everyone follow the rules, and goes through the same process to become a U.S. citizen.’” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Rick Santorum: “Enticements to illegal immigration, such as birthright citizenship, should be ended.” “Other enticements to illegal immigration, such as birthright citizenship, should be ended. Only children born on American soil where at least one parent is a citizen or resident aliens is automatically a U.S. citizen. Of developed countries other than the United States, only Canada has birthright citizenship.” [Rick Santorum op-ed, Breitbart, 5/6/15]
Bobby Jindal said he was “happy” to use the term “anchor baby” and that “folks today are too easily offended.” “HEMMER: But, you’ll use anchor baby, right, as a phrase? JINDAL: Yeah look, I think folks today are too easily offended. They are too politically correct. The real issue here is, yeah I’m happy to use the term, but the reality is, the real issue here is when you secure our border. The bigger frustration from the American people. It doesn’t seem to matter who is in charge in D.C. secure the borders. Stop illegal immigration.” [Fox News, 8/20/15]
Bobby Jindal supported ending birthright citizenship in the United States. “Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has joined front-running GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump in calling for an end to automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to illegal immigrants. ‘We need to end birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants,’ Jindal tweeted Monday night, a day after Trump offered a tough plan to combat what he calls the negative economic consequences of illegal immigration. Jindal is also running for president, though he remains near the bottom of the 17-person GOP field.” [Times-Picayune, 8/18/15]
Lindsey Graham: “I think it’s a bad practice to give citizenship based on birth.” “Graham, one of Trump’s most outspoken critics, took a more nuanced approach on Monday to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. ‘I don’t mind changing the law,’ the South Carolina senator said. ‘I think it’s a bad practice to give citizenship based on birth. We have evidence of people buying tourist visas for the express purpose of coming over here and having a child as birth tourism. I don’t think that’s a good idea. But that’s not going to happen until we fix a broken immigration system.’” [Bloomberg, 8/19/15]
Lindsay Graham: “We should change our Constitution and say if you come here illegally and you have a child, that child’s automatically not a citizen.” “Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says that the United States should end its policy of guaranteeing citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants as ensured by the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The South Carolina Senator defined his stance on the immigration issue on Wednesday in an interview with Fox News host Greta Van Susteren. ‘Birthright citizenship I think is a mistake,’ explained Graham. ‘We should change our Constitution and say if you come here illegally and you have a child, that child’s automatically not a citizen.’” [Huffington Post, 7/29/10]
]]>This week, leading Republican presidential candidates Ben Carson and Donald Trump continued Republican efforts to foster a culture of Islamophobia in America – Carson stated that he would “not advocate” electing a Muslim as president and Trump refused to correct hateful and inaccurate comments made to him at a town hall about President Obama. Carson and Trump are not alone – the Republican presidential field is composed of candidates who have encouraged religious hatred that is a direct contradiction to bedrock American values, including freedom of religion.
Ben Carson said Islam is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and he would “not advocate” electing a Muslim as President. “Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson said he would not support a Muslim as President of the United States. Responding to a question on ‘Meet the Press,’ the retired neurosurgeon said, ‘I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.’ He also said that Islam, as a religion, is incompatible with the Constitution. Carson, who is near the top of several early presidential polls, said a president’s faith should matter depending on what that faith is. ‘If it’s inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter,’ he clarified.” [NBC, 9/20/15]
Donald Trump did not take issue with a man who said Muslims were a “problem” and asked him “when can we get rid of them?” “At a town hall in New Hampshire, a man stood up and asked the billionaire businessman this question: ‘We have a problem in this country. It’s called Muslims. We know our current president is one. You know he’s not even an American. We have training camps growing when they want to kill us. My question: When can we get rid of them?’ Trump, who had even interrupted the man to say, ‘We need this question,’ didn’t knock down the premise of his question at the end. Here’s how he responded: ‘We are going to be looking at a lot of different things. And a lot of people are saying that, and a lot of people are saying that bad things are happening out there. We are going to be looking at that and plenty of other things.’” [NPR, 9/18/15]
Donald Trump told Bill O’Reilly, “absolutely” there was a Muslim problem, adding “I don’t notice Swedish people knocking down the World Trade Center.” “O’Reilly asked Trump whether there is a Muslim problem in the world. ‘Absolutely, absolutely — I don’t notice Swedish people knocking down the World Trade Center,’ Trump said. ‘I came out very strongly against the mosque being built virtually across the street. ‘The fact is, it was so insensitive when they announced the mosque in that location,’ he said. ‘Don’t forget, that’s my territory — Manhattan. When they announced the mosque in that location, I couldn’t believe it.’” [Newsmax, 3/30/11]
Donald Trump on the Quran: “there’s something there that teaches some very negative vibe.” “Brody: With some evangelicals there are some problems with the teachings of the Koran. Do you have concerns about the Koran?” Trump: Well, I’ll tell you what. The Koran is very interesting. A lot of people says it teaches love and there is a very big group of people who really understand the Koran far better than I do. I’m certainly not an expert, to put it mildly. But there’s something there that teaches some very negative vibe.” [CBN News, 4/12/11]
Mike Huckabee called Muslims “uncorked animals” and said Islam is “a religion that promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet.” “Speaking on his radio program on Monday, Huckabee prefaced his remarks by saying that he understood it was ‘politically incorrect’ to ‘say anything unkind about Islam.’ He then went on to suggest that Islamic teachings were to blame for recent unrest during the holy month of Ramadan. ‘Can someone explain to me why it is that we tiptoe around a religion that promotes the most murderous mayhem on the planet in their so-called ‘holiest days,’’ Huckabee said. ‘You know, if you’ve kept up with the Middle East, you know that the most likely time to have an uprising of rock throwing and rioting comes on the day of prayer on Friday. So the Muslims will go to the mosque, and they will have their day of prayer, and they come out of there like uncorked animals — throwing rocks and burning cars.’” [Huffington Post, 8/9/13]
Mike Huckabee referred to Islam as “the antithesis of the gospel of Christ.” “‘If the purpose of a church is to push forth the gospel of Jesus Christ, and then you have a Muslim group that says that Jesus Christ and all the people that follow him are a bunch of infidels who should be essentially obliterated, I guess I have a hard time understanding that,’ said Huckabee, who has his own show on Fox News. ‘Is there a reason to say that the people who donated, who gave, who sacrificed to give that facility really ever intended it to be a place where something that is the antithesis of the gospel of Christ would be presented?’ he added.’” [The Hill, 2/21/11]
Bobby Jindal refused to back down from calling certain areas in European cities “no-go zones” because of Muslim fundamentalists. “Bobby Jindal refused to apologize Wednesday for calling certain areas in Europe ‘no-go zones’ due to influence from fundamentalist Muslims. Appearing on Fox News’ ‘Your World with Neil Cavuto,’ the Louisiana governor, who is eyeing a run for the presidency, reiterated recent comments he’d made in London and to CNN about supposed areas, where ‘women don’t feel comfortable going in without veils’ and ‘where police are less likely to go in.’ Over the past week, Fox News issued apologies after multiple commentators and hosts referred to various locations across Europe, including in France and Britain, as ‘no-go zones.’ Pundit Steve Emerson, in particular, claimed that the British city of Birmingham was ‘totally Muslim, [a city] where non-Muslims simply don’t go in,’ and that it had ‘Sharia courts’ that enforce Islamic law.” [Politico, 1/21/15]
Bobby Jindal: “Islam has a problem [with violent extremism].” “As Islamic terrorists launch attacks across the globe, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal plans to call on Muslim leaders to publicly condemn these ‘acts of barbarism,’ declaring: ‘Let’s be honest here, Islam has a problem.’ ‘If Islam does not support what is happening in the name of Islam, then they need to stand up and stop it,’ Jindal says in prepared remarks released by his office ahead of his Monday speech in London. ‘Many Islamic leaders argue that these are the acts of a radical few.’ ‘I will warn you in advance that I’m going to say some things that are not politically correct, so brace yourselves,’ Jindal, a potential Republican candidate for president, will say at the Henry Jackson Society on Monday. ‘To be clear, I have no interest in defaming any religion, nor do I have any interest in assigning the maniacal acts of radical Islamists to millions of Muslims worldwide,’ Jindal says. ‘I’m interested only in dealing with reality and facts.’” [Daily Caller, 1/15/15]
Bobby Jindal said “non-assimilationist Muslims” threaten Western society because they support acts of violence, adhere to Islamic law, and refuse to embrace Western culture. “If Bobby Jindal runs for president, he will likely campaign on two major themes. The first, which he outlined last February at the Reagan Library and last May at Liberty University, is that Christians are at war with a liberal elite that is trampling religious liberty and secularizing American culture. The second, which he laid out this month at London’s Henry Jackson Society, is that ‘non-assimilationist Muslims’ are endangering America and Europe. In London, Jindal said ‘non-assimilationist Muslims’ threaten the West not merely because they support acts of violence, and not merely because they adhere to Islamic rather than national law. Most fundamentally, they pose a threat because they refuse to embrace the cultures of the countries to which they immigrate.” [The Atlantic Magazine, 1/29/15]
Jeb Bush hired as his political adviser a lawyer who called supporters of the Ground Zero Mosque “terrorists.” “Lawyer and political adviser Jordan Sekulow is the Saul Goodman of social conservatism. He frequently appears on right-wing television to pontificate—his face caked with makeup, hair gelled back, suit shining, and double chin taking on a life of its own—about a wide range of topics, from Christian persecution to conservative persecution. On social media, he branded those behind the proposed Ground Zero Mosque ‘terrorists.’ And in his capacity as executive director of the American Center for Law and Justice, televangelist Pat Robertson’s snake oil mega-mall of right-wing legal causes, he has lobbied foreign governments to ban homosexuality and fought efforts to allow exceptions to anti-abortion laws when the life of the mother is at risk. And on Friday, he announced he’s going to work for Jeb Bush. That’s right, Sekulow will be a senior adviser to the political action committee of the likely Republican presidential candidate most often labeled a moderate.” [Daily Beast, 3/15/15]
Ted Cruz appointed an anti-Islamic politician as his Tennessee campaign chair, who once condemned Tennessee’s governor for hiring a Muslim and creating a council on Islamic affairs. “Ted Cruz’s presidential campaign is pushing back against criticism that the Texas senator named an anti-Islamic politician as his state chairman in Tennessee. On Wednesday, Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler called the reaction to the appointment ‘absurd.’ Tyler’s comments came in response to a prominent Muslim-American advocacy group’s complaints about the Cruz campaign’s new state chairman, Kevin Kookogey. Announcing the move, Cruz hailed Kookogey’s ‘experience and knowledge of both the landscape in Tennessee and the issues that matter to Tennesseans,’ such as ‘American sovereignty, defense, and religious liberty.’ As chairman of the Williamson County Republican Party in 2012, Kookogey pushed a resolution condemning Republican Gov. Bill Haslam for hiring Samar Ali, a practicing Muslim, and for appointing a council on Islamic affairs in the state.” [Politico, 6/11/15]
Rick Santorum said there is “a fundamental foundational problem in Islam of embracing issues of freedom of conscience and religious persecution,” adding “you don’t have any Baptist ministers going on jihad.” “During his speech on Friday at the Values Voter Summit, former Senator and Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum claimed that ‘the West’ was in an ‘existential fight’ against the forces of ‘radical Islam.’ Unlike fellow Values Voter Summit speaker Michele Bachmann (R) — who urged President Barack Obama to go to war with all of Islam — Santorum limited his criticism to those Muslims who were rightly hesitant about modernity. Still, he noted, there is ‘a fundamental foundational problem in Islam of embracing issues of freedom of conscience and religious persecution.’ ‘Christendom [once] expanded by the sword, that doesn’t happen anymore,’ he continued, but ‘you don’t have any Baptist ministers going on jihad.’ ‘The Western world,’ Santorum said, ‘has come to terms with religious liberty, freedom of conscience, and that persuasion is the way to spread the faith.’” [Raw Story, 9/28/14]
Rick Santorum endorsed profiling of Muslims. “In a discussion over balancing national security and privacy, Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said Tuesday he would endorse profiling, specifically of Muslims and young men, in order to enhance security at airports. ‘We should be trying to find the bomber, not the bomb,’ the former Pennsylvania senator said at the CNN debate, explaining his support for profiling. He cited the use of profiling in Israel as an example of how it would work. Asked to explain by debate moderator CNN’s Wolf Blitzer who would be profiled, Santorum said, ‘The folks who are most likely to be committing these crimes.’ ‘Obviously, Muslims would be someone you’d look at,’ he said, adding that ‘the radical Muslims are the people that are committing these crimes, by and large, as well as younger males.” [CBS News, 11/23/11]
Rand Paul told a reporter that individuals coming into the country from predominantly Muslim countries should receive extra scrutiny. “Breitbart News is reporting that GOP presidential candidate Rand Paul told one of its reporters backstage at a speech in Houston last night that the U.S. should provide extra scrutiny of people coming into the country from predominantly Muslim countries after the Chattanooga, Tenn., terrorist attack on Friday. ‘I’m very concerned about immigration to this country from countries that have hotbeds of jihadism and hotbeds of this Islamism,’ Paul told Breitbart. ‘I think there does need to be heightened scrutiny. Nobody has a right to come to America, so this isn’t something that we can say ‘oh, their rights are being violated.’ It’s a privilege to come to America and we need to thoroughly screen those who are coming.’” [USA Today, 7/18/15]
Marco Rubio entertained the notion of putting a stop to visas for Muslim students. “CAVUTO: Senator, there are some getting leery of all the Muslim students in America. Bob Beckel is among those saying stop grants visas, others speaking about slowing down the number getting into the country. What do you think? RUBIO: We need to be open to changes that provide more security. I don’t like profiling anybody or singling or generally leading, on the other hand student visas are something this country does because it’s in our national interest but you don’t have a right to a student visa. I’m not prepared to take a firm position on restriction. I want to learn about what might have worked to prevent past attacks.” [Fox News, 4/24/13]
Geroge Pataki, in opposing the Ground Zero Mosque, conflated Islam with the 9/11 attack. “Pataki: No… no, no. Dylan of course not. If this were a corner mosque for a local community, I don’t think you would hear this reaction at all, but this is supposed to be a major center of Islamic… ah… whatever… tolerance… it’s 12 to 15 stories high. This is not the neighborhood mosque… (crosstalk) Ratigan: But what’s the difference with it being Muslim? Pataki: This is a symbol of Islam being built two blocks… (crosstalk) Ratigan: What’s wrong with that? Pataki: Let me tell… the point is that it was Islamist terrorists who attacked us on September 11th they weren’t Buddhists, they weren’t Episcopalians (crosstalk)…” [MSNBC, 8/16/10]
Lindsay Graham on the Arabic call to prayer: “Allahu Akbar” is a “war chant.” “‘It’s not like, ‘Hey, how you doing Lindsey,’’ he said on Fox News radio. Graham was asked about the phrase, which translates to ‘God is great,’ in light of Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) remark that people shouldn’t find the phrase offensive. ‘For someone to say ‘Allahu akbar,’ it’s about as offensive as someone saying, ‘Thank God,’’ McCain said earlier this month. But Graham, who is a friend and ally of McCain’s, said he’s sees it differently. ‘‘Allahu akbar,’ I associate with a war chant,’ Graham told host Brian Kilmeade. ‘It’s not exclusively owned by al Qaeda. I’ve seen people kill al Qaeda guys and yell, ‘Allahu akbar.’’ The Arabic phrase is used often; it’s said during every call to prayer in the Muslim tradition.” [The Hill, 9/23/13]
Lindsay Graham said Charleston shooting reminded him of “Mideast hate.” “Last week’s horrific shooting in a black church in Charleston, South Carolina reminded Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) of violence in the Middle East. ‘I don’t know how you can sit with somebody for an hour in a church and pray with them and get up and shoot them. That’s Mideast hate,’ Graham said Wednesday on the Senate floor. ‘That’s something I didn’t think we had here, but apparently we do.’ Asked by a reporter after his speech to clarify his comments, Graham told NBC’s Frank Thorpe, ‘What ISIL is doing, that kind of hate. It’s kind of that hard-heart, that, you know, heart that has been hardened after generations of hate.’ Graham made a similar comment last week in an interview the morning after the shooting. ‘To go into God’s space and do this, I don’t know,’ he told ABC News. ‘You can’t explain it. … I go to the Middle East a lot. I’ve seen hate up close. I’ve seen communities where everybody has been killed because they’re a different religion, and you think that’s just over there. Sometimes it’s not just over there.’” [Huffington Post, 6/25/15]
]]>[gview file=”http://correct2016.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/GOPDebateDossierVolume2.pdf” height=”800px” width=”600px” save=”0″]
]]>