Correct the Record logo
human rights – Correct The Record https://correctrecord.org Correct The Record is a strategic research and rapid response team designed to defend Hillary Clinton from baseless attacks. Tue, 08 Nov 2016 06:06:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.1 The GOP on Marriage Equality https://correctrecord.org/the-gop-on-marriage-equality-scotus/ Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:59:27 +0000 http://correct2016.wpengine.com/?p=1401 On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark decision in favor of marriage equality. While millions of Americans are celebrating today’s victory, Republican presidential hopefuls are fighting against the currents of progress, desperately fear mongering and continuing to use marriage equality to divide us.

Hillary Clinton proudly celebrated this step forward for our country.  As Hillary said today, our nation is at its best when we are “inclusive, open, and striving towards true equality.” Now is the time to celebrate a hard-fought victory for marriage equality and gay and lesbian couples across the country.

 

The GOP on Marriage Equality

Jeb Bush

Jeb Bush: “I believe in traditional marriage.” “Guided by my faith, I believe in traditional marriage.  I believe the Supreme Court should have allowed the states to make this decision.  I also believe that we should love our neighbor and respect others, including those making lifetime commitments.  In a country as diverse as ours, good people who have opposing views should be able to live side by side.  It is now crucial that as a country we protect religious freedom and the right of conscience and also not discriminate.” [Jeb Bush campaign, 6/26/15]

Jeb Bush “rejected” the characterization that he was a “gay-friendly Republican.” “If Bush runs for president, some of his closest aides will be individuals who are strong public supporters of legalizing same-sex marriage. The hires, reported BuzzFeed, led to some chatter among Republicans that Bush could position himself as ‘the gay-friendly Republican in the 2016 field.’ Bush, however, rejected that characterization Friday at the Conservative Political Action Conference during his conversation with Fox News host Sean Hannity. ‘No. I believe in traditional marriage,’ said Bush when Hannity asked him whether he’s changing his position on the issue.” [Huffington Post, 2/27/15]

Jeb Bush considered supporting an amendment to the Florida constitution banning same-sex marriage. “Gov. Jeb Bush said Friday night he’s moving away from a longstanding position that there’s no need for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriages. At a fundraiser for the Florida Family Policy Council, a conservative group that backs such a ban, Bush said courts in other states overturning laws banning gay marriages have led him to the conclusion that a change to the Florida Constitution might be necessary. ‘We may be at that point in our state,’ he said.” [Orlando Sentinel, 5/20/06]

Jeb Bush: “Traditional marriage is what should be sanctioned.” “Of course, he also looked to Obama for leadership and pointed out the obvious, that it’s a wedge issue that helps Democrats, so it’s politically easier to demonize the GOP on immigration than to try to come to a compromise and fix the system. On same-sex marriage, Bush didn’t hide from his conservative belief that ‘traditional marriage is what should be sanctioned,’ but ‘not at the expense of discriminating other forms of family structure.’” [Miami Herald, 6/9/12]

 

Ben Carson

Ben Carson said that “marriage is between a man and a woman” and compared supporters of marriage equality to “people who believe in bestiality.” “In response to a question by Sean Hannity about his views on gay marriage, Ben Carson said, ‘Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It’s a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn’t matter what they are. They don’t get to change the definition.’” [Slate, 3/28/13]

 

Chris Christie

Chris Christie vetoed a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage in New Jersey. “Same-sex marriage proponents were dealt a setback Friday, though not an unexpected one, when Gov. Chris Christie vetoed a bill that would let gay couples marry. Roughly six hours after the bill arrived at his desk, Christie issued a conditional veto, asking lawmakers to instead ‘create a strong ombudsman for civil unions to carry on New Jersey’s strong tradition of tolerance and fairness.’ The Republican governor had long promised a veto. He said changes to the marriage law should be done only if approved by voters through a statewide vote, not through an act by lawmakers.” [Asbury Park Press, 2/17/12]

Chris Christie waged a losing legal battle to block marriage equality in New Jersey. “Christie dropped a legal fight to block same-sex marriage in New Jersey in 2013 after the State Supreme Court indicated it would not stop the unions, saying now: ‘Yeah, it is a settled issue in New Jersey.’ ‘When I know that I’ve been defeated you don’t bang your head against a wall and spend taxpayer money to do it,’ he said, explaining his decision. ‘Absent a change in the legislature, I think at the moment it’s settled law in New Jersey.’” [TIME, 7/12/14]

Chris Christie said New Jersey had settled on the gay marriage issue, but the majority of the country had not. “Christie said that same-sex marriage ‘is a settled issue’ in New Jersey but that the rest of the country would resolve it in time. ‘Do I think it’s resolved now? No,’ he said. ‘The overwhelming majority of states in the country still ban same-sex marriage, so I don’t think it’s time to stop having a discussion.’” [Associated Press,7/12/14]

Christie said the country should continue to debate gay marriage. “Christie said that same-sex marriage ‘is a settled issue’ in New Jersey but that the rest of the country would resolve it in time. ‘Do I think it’s resolved now? No,’ he said. ‘The overwhelming majority of states in the country still ban same-sex marriage, so I don’t think it’s time to stop having a discussion.’” [Associated Press, 7/12/14]

Chris Christie said he would not change his mind on same-sex marriage even if one of his children was gay. “Christie and Buono also clashed on marriage equality. Asked how he would react if any of his children told him they were gay, Christie maintained his opposition to legalizing same-sex marriage. ‘If my children came to me and said they were gay I would grab them and hug them and tell them I love them,’ Christie said. ‘I would also tell them that your dad believes that marriage is between one man and one woman.’” [Newark Star-Ledger 10/16/13]

 

Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz said a Supreme Court ruling in favor of marriage equality was “naked and lawless judicial activism.” “Sen. Ted Cruz, another Republican candidate for president, warned in a speech Thursday of a deliberate attempt by Democrats to impose ‘mandatory gay marriage in all 50 states.’ ‘I would encourage everyone here to be lifting up in prayer that [the Supreme Court] not engage in an act of naked and lawless judicial activism tearing down the marriage laws adopted pursuant to the Constitution,’ Cruz said.” [RealClearPolitics, 6/19/15]

Ted Cruz “warned of the dangers of gay marriage.” “Cruz warned of the dangers of gay marriage a month after the Supreme Court decision in a July 2013 interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network. ‘If you look at other nations that have gone down the road towards gay marriage, that’s the next step where it gets enforced,’ he said. ‘It gets enforced against Christian pastors who decline to perform gay marriages, who speak out and preach biblical truths on marriage.’” [Huffington Post, 2/13/14]

Ted Cruz introduced legislation that would allow states to define marriage. “It seems Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has taken up a new cause in Congress — defending states’ right to regulate marriage. Amid a wave of court decisions striking down anti-gay marriage laws in states, the Texas Republican introduced a bill to the Senate Wednesday to amend U.S. law ‘with regard to the definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’ for Federal purposes and to ensure respect for State regulation of marriage.’” [Huffington Post, 2/13/14]

 

Carly Fiorina

Carly Fiorina opposed the Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of marriage equality. “This is only the latest example of an activist Court ignoring its constitutional duty to say what the law is and not what the law should be. Justice Alito spoke for so many of us when he said that ‘[t]oday’s decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to keep or alter the traditional understanding of marriage…All Americans, whatever their thinking on that issue, should worry about what the majority’s claim of power portends.’ The Court ruled today that all Americans should receive equal benefits and rights from the government under the law. I have always supported this view. However, this decision was also about the definition of marriage itself. I do not agree that the Court can or should redefine marriage. I believe that responsibility should have remained with states and voters where this conversation has continued in churches, town halls and living rooms around the country.” [Carly Fiorina statement, 6/26/15]

Carly Fiorina opposed marriage equality and supported California’s Proposition 8 referendum that banned same-sex marriage. “Carly Fiorina cited President Obama’s opposition to same-sex marriage to substantiate her belief that ‘marriage is between a man and a woman’ and moderate her support for Proposition 8: I do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, but also have been consistent and clear that I support civil unions for gay and lesbian couples. The Defense of Marriage Act had broad bipartisan support. And actually, the position I’ve consistently espoused is consistent with that of our President and a vast majority of senators in the U.S. Senate…The voters were quite clear about their views on this [Proposition 8] and this is now going through a legal process.” [Think Progress, 9/1/10]

 

Lindsey Graham

Lindsey Graham: “I believe in traditional marriage.” “The piece quotes quite a few lawmakers who aren’t willing to endorse marriage equality – including alleged champions of civil liberties like Rand Paul – but my personal favorite came from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.): ‘I believe in traditional marriage – between a man and a woman, without animosity. I don’t mind if people are able to transfer their property, visit their loved ones in hospitals, but marriage to me, I’ve stayed with the concept of traditional marriage.’” [MSNBC, 3/21/13]

Lindsey Graham compared marriage equality to polygamy. “During Loretta Lynch’s confirmation hearing Wednesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) tried to take the attorney general nominee down the slippery-slope argument often made against the marriage equality movement by inquiring what the legal difference is between marriage of same-sex couples and that of three or more people. ‘What is the legal difference between a state — a ban on same-sex marriage being unconstitutional but a ban on polygamy being constitutional?’ he inquired at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. ‘Could you try to articulate how one could be banned under the Constitution and the other not?’” [Huffington Post, 1/28/15]

 

Mike Huckabee

Mike Huckabee said the Supreme Court ruling in favor of marriage equality was an “irrational, unconstitutional…flawed, failed decision.” “The Supreme Court has spoken with a very divided voice on something only the Supreme Being can do-redefine marriage. I will not acquiesce to an imperial court any more than our Founders acquiesced to an imperial British monarch. We must resist and reject judicial tyranny, not retreat. This ruling is not about marriage equality, it’s about marriage redefinition. This irrational, unconstitutional rejection of the expressed will of the people in over 30 states will prove to be one of the court’s most disastrous decisions, and they have had many. The only outcome worse than this flawed, failed decision would be for the President and Congress, two co-equal branches of government, to surrender in the face of this out-of-control act of unconstitutional, judicial tyranny. The Supreme Court can no more repeal the laws of nature and nature’s God on marriage than it can the law of gravity. Under our Constitution, the court cannot write a law, even though some cowardly politicians will wave the white flag and accept it without realizing that they are failing their sworn duty to reject abuses from the court. If accepted by Congress and this President, this decision will be a serious blow to religious liberty, which is the heart of the First Amendment.” [Mike Huckabee statement, 6/26/15]

Mike Huckabee said the U.S. would “pay the consequences” for allowing same-sex couples to marry. “Huckabee drew a parallel between the struggle against abortion rights and the right’s battle against equality for same-sex couples. Calling straights-only marriage ‘the foundation of our society and culture,’ Huckabee warned that by allowing same-sex couples to get married, ‘we will pay the consequences for having upended the very foundation which is the essence of how a civilization survives.’ ‘So the soul of America is in real trouble,’ he concluded.” [Salon, 11/25/14]

Mike Huckabee signed onto “a pledge condemning same-sex parents and marriage equality.” “Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum are the only two Republican presidential candidates who have signed on to a pledge condemning same-sex parents and marriage equality, authored by the Texas pastor who recently promised to burn himself alive if the Supreme Court rules in favor of marriage equality, according to U.K. LGBT outlet Pink News. Republican presidential hopefuls Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum both signed on to the ever-growing ‘pledge in solidarity to defend marriage,’ which claims that ‘marriage as existing solely between one man and one woman precedes civil government.’ The pledge, first reported by The Advocate June 15, goes on to (inaccurately) claim that ‘no civil institution, including the United States Supreme Court or any court, has authority to redefine marriage.’ That’s an argument both Huckabee and Santorum have advanced with increasing frequency as the high court nears a decision that could bring marriage equality to all 50 states by the end of the month.” [The Advocate, 6/23/15]

Mike Huckabee said that as president “he would simply ignore any Supreme Court decision in favor of marriage equality.” “Yesterday, Mike Huckabee chatted with Iowa radio host Steve Deace and Religious Right organizer Bob Vander Plaats, who led Huckabee’s 2008 campaign in the first-in-the-nation caucus state, about the Supreme Court’s upcoming ruling on gay marriage. He said that if elected president, he would simply ignore any Supreme Court decision in favor of marriage equality until Congress passed legislation legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide…which he would then veto. ‘Until the Congress of the United States puts on my desk a bill that basically defies the laws of Nature and Nature’s God and defies the longstanding tradition of marriage, the federal government will not recognize same-sex marriage because there is no law that requires it and that would be true for the military and it would be true for all federal institutions,’ Huckabee said. ‘If the Congress decides that they want to pass enabling legislation, they could put it on my desk and I would veto it, and they can attempt to override it. That’s the process.’” [Right Wing Watch, 6/23/15]

 

Bobby Jindal

Bobby Jindal said the Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of marriage equality paved “the way for an all out assault against the religious freedom rights of Christians.” “The Supreme Court decision today conveniently and not surprisingly follows public opinion polls, and tramples on states’ rights that were once protected by the 10th Amendment of the Constitution. Marriage between a man and a woman was established by God, and no earthly court can alter that. This decision will pave the way for an all out assault against the religious freedom rights of Christians who disagree with this decision. This ruling must not be used as pretext by Washington to erode our right to religious liberty.” [Bobby Jindal press release, 6/26/15]

Bobby Jindal said he wanted to leave “the matter of marriage to the states.” “Jindal, too, appears to be heading in the same direction. In response to the Supreme Court’s DOMA ruling last year he said, ‘I believe every child deserves a mom and a dad. This opinion leaves the matter of marriage to the states where people can decide. In Louisiana, we will opt for traditional marriage. How about we let the people decide for themselves, via their representatives and via referendum?’ The lawsuits in the U.S. District Court challenging Louisiana’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage remain in their early stages. Gov. Bobby Jindal, R-La., will likely appeal any court decision allowing same-sex marriage in his state. Jindal, who supported a gay marriage ban as a congressman, would likely support an appeal if the plaintiffs are successful. ‘I believe in traditional marriage,’ Jindal told U.S. News in an email. ‘I realize that public opinion on this may be changing, but unlike President [Barack] Obama and Hillary Clinton, I’m not a weather vane who ‘evolves’ with the polls.’” [US News & World Report, 7/14/14]

Bobby Jindal opposed same-sex marriage and said that states had the right to reject same-sex marriage.  “During a speech in California last week, Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana defended the rights of states to reject gay marriage as a matter of faith. He calls the legal battles an assault on the freedom of religion. ‘It is a war — a silent war — but it is a war against religious liberty. This war is waged in our courts and in the halls of political power,’ Jindal says.” [NPR, 2/20/14]

 

John Kasich

John Kasich opposed both same-sex marriage and civil unions. “Ohio Gov. John Kasich revealed on Wednesday that he supports civil unions for same-sex couples. But don’t quote him on that. A spokesman for the Republican governor said Thursday that Kasich misspoke when he expressed support for the legal partnerships. The truth is, he doesn’t. ‘The governor’s position is unchanged,’ Kasich’s spokesman Rob Nichols said Thursday in a statement. ‘He opposes gay marriage and opposes changing Ohio’s constitution to allow for civil unions.’” [Cleveland Plain Dealer, 3/21/13]

 

Rand Paul

Rand Paul lamented the “moral crisis that allows people to think that there would be some sort of other marriage” in addition to “traditional” marriage. “At a prayer breakfast in Washington, D.C. on Thursday morning, Rand Paul practiced pandering. The senator from Kentucky will announce that he is running for president in less than two weeks, and it seems the pressure to be all things to all people is resulting in the breakdown of his political brand, with the latest example being his newly articulated position on marriage. He conceded to the evangelical crowd, which included Dr. Jerry Johnson, CEO of the National Religious Broadcasters, that there is a ‘moral crisis in our country’ and more specifically, ‘a moral crisis that allows people to think that there would be some sort of other marriage’ in addition to heterosexual, or ‘traditional,’ marriage.” [Daily Beast, 3/28/15]

Rand Paul said he believed the issue of gay marriage should be left to states; said the GOP should “agree to disagree” on the issue.  “Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told ABC News he believes the Supreme Court ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act was appropriate, and that the issue should be left to the states. He praised Justice Anthony Kennedy for avoiding ‘a cultural war.’ ‘As a country we can agree to disagree,’ Paul said today, stopping for a moment to talk as he walked through the Capitol. ‘As a Republican Party, that’s kind of where we are as well. The party is going to have to agree to disagree on some of these issues.’ The comments from Paul, a likely GOP presidential candidate in 2016, highlight how the party’s field could divide over gay marriage. Many Republicans have been unusually muted in their reactions to the Supreme Court rulings today. Paul said he agreed with Kennedy, whom he called ‘someone who doesn’t just want to be in front of opinion but wants government to keep up with opinion.’ He said Kennedy ‘tried to strike a balance.’” [ABC News, 6/26/13]

Rand Paul: “I think marriage should be taken care of at the state level.” According to the Courier Journal, Paul stated: “I think marriage should be taken care of at the state level.” [The Courier Journal, 10/19/09]

 

Rick Perry

Rick Perry criticized the legal decision that declared Texas’ ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. “Texas Gov. Rick Perry criticized the ruling made Wednesday by a federal judge in his state striking down the ban on same-sex marriage. ‘This is yet another attempt to achieve via the courts what couldn’t be achieved at the ballot box,’ the Republican governor said in a statement. ‘We will continue to fight for the rights of Texans to self-determine the laws of our state.’ The state’s ban on same-sex marriage was deemed unconstitutional by Judge Orlando Garcia, who will continue to allow the ban to be enforced, pending an appeal. The ruling followed a lawsuit filed by two gay couples challenging a constitutional amendment and law, according to the Associated Press.” [Politico, 2/26/14]

Rick Perry compared homosexuality to alcoholism. “Republican Texas Gov. Rick Perry reportedly compared gay people to alcoholism at an event in San Francisco on Wednesday. The moderator at the Commonwealth Club of California asked him if he considered homosexuality to be a disorder, according to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle. ‘Whether or not you feel compelled to follow a particular lifestyle or not, you have the ability to decide not to do that,’ Perry allegedly said. ‘I may have the genetic coding that I’m inclined to be an alcoholic, but I have the desire not to do that, and I look at the homosexual issue the same way.’” [MSNBC, 6/12/14]

 

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio opposed same sex marriage and lamented the “growing intolerance” toward people “who continue to support traditional marriage.” “‘There is a growing intolerance on this issue, intolerance of those who continue to support traditional marriage,’ the Florida Republican senator and potential 2016 presidential contender told a standing-room only crowd. ‘Even before this speech is over, I’ll be attacked as a hater or bigot. Or someone who’s anti-gay. This intolerance in the name of tolerance is hypocrisy. Supporting the definition of marriage as one man and one woman, is not anti-gay. It is pro-traditional marriage’…Rubio, who supports marriage between a man and a woman, spent more than five-minutes of half-hour address wading into the thorny issue of same-sex marriage. His comments reflect the GOP’s struggle to find a position on an issue that enjoys growing public support — including from a handful of Republicans in Congress — but often alienates the party’s conservative base.” [Politico, 7/23/14]

Marco Rubio recorded a call for the National Organization for Marriage in support of traditional marriage. “Neither the National Organization for Marriage’s Brian Brown nor a spokesman from the Family Research Council — two organizations that strongly support a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex couples from marrying — responded Wednesday to BuzzFeed’s request for comment on Rubio’s remarks about marriage. (Just prior to the November 2012 election, Rubio recorded a call for NOM in support of marriage remaining limited to one man and one woman.)” [BuzzFeed, 2/6/13]

 

Rick Santorum

Rick Santorum opposed same-sex marriage and compared legalizing same-sex marriage to legalizing polygamy. “Asked by a college student why he opposed the right of same-sex couples to wed, he responded that there was no compelling reason to allow it and suggested that it was akin to legalizing polygamy. ‘So, everybody has the right to be happy?’ he said. ‘So, if you’re not happy unless you’re married to five other people, is that OK?’ Santorum’s logic provoked an outcry from the audience, which was made up primarily of local college students but also a number of local conservative voters who were there to support the surging presidential candidate.” [Washington Post, 1/5/12]

Rick Santorum likened same-sex marriage to bestiality and pedophilia, arguing the definition of marriage does not include homosexuality, “man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.” “Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that’s what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing.” [USA Today, 4/23/03]

Rick Santorum signed onto “a pledge condemning same-sex parents and marriage equality.” “Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum are the only two Republican presidential candidates who have signed on to a pledge condemning same-sex parents and marriage equality, authored by the Texas pastor who recently promised to burn himself alive if the Supreme Court rules in favor of marriage equality, according to U.K. LGBT outlet Pink News. Republican presidential hopefuls Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum both signed on to the ever-growing ‘pledge in solidarity to defend marriage,’ which claims that ‘marriage as existing solely between one man and one woman precedes civil government.’ The pledge, first reported by The Advocate June 15, goes on to (inaccurately) claim that ‘no civil institution, including the United States Supreme Court or any court, has authority to redefine marriage.’ That’s an argument both Huckabee and Santorum have advanced with increasing frequency as the high court nears a decision that could bring marriage equality to all 50 states by the end of the month.” [The Advocate, 6/23/15]

 

Scott Walker

Scott Walker proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to “reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.” “I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake. […] As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.” [Scott Walker statement, 6/26/15]

Scott Walker supported a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. “The other day, Scott Walker declared that if the Supreme Court rules for a Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, he’d support a Constitutional amendment allowing states to ban it. This stance would not have been surprising coming from Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, or Ted Cruz. But coming from a self-styled reform governor who represents a new generation of leaders, it turned a lot of talking heads.” [Washington Post, 6/11/15]

Scott Walker supported a proposed amendment to the Wisconsin state constitution to ban gay marriage and civil unions. “Wisconsin voters will decide in November whether to amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage and civil unions after the proposal cleared its final hurdle in the Republican-controlled Legislature Tuesday evening. […] The two Republicans seeking their party’s nomination for governor U.S. Rep. Mark Green and Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker both support the ban.” [Associated Press, 3/1/06]

Scott Walker stood by the state’s constitutional ban on gay marriage. “Barrett also voiced his support for gay marriage, while Walker said he stands by the state’s constitutional ban on gay marriages passed in 2006.” [Associated Press, 5/26/12]

Scott Walker said he still supported same-sex marriage ban even after federal judge had declared it unconstitutional.  “Governor Scott Walker says he still supports the state’s ban on same sex marriage, even after Thursday’s appeals court ruling that the ban is unconstitutional. At a campaign stop in Eau Claire, Governor Walker said he and Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen will continue to defend the gay marriage ban. Walker says, ‘Until the U.S. Supreme Court either chooses not to take it up or were to rule that the law here and elsewhere is unconstitutional, we are still obligated to support the constitution as it was amended by the voters.’” [WKOW, 9/5/14]

]]>
Hillary Clinton vs. Rand Paul on the Issues http://correct2016.wpengine.com/hillary-vs-gop/#rand Sun, 12 Apr 2015 05:12:02 +0000 http://correct2016.wpengine.com/?p=1156 Issue Rand Paul Hillary Clinton LGBT Rights Rand Paul said that he doesn’t “really believe” in gay rights. “Sen. Rand Paul said he doesn’t buy into the concept of gay rights because they are defined by a gay person’s lifestyle. ‘I don’t think I’ve ever used the word gay rights, because I don’t really believe in rights based on your behavior,’ the Kentucky Republican told reporters in a videotaped interview that has received little attention since it was recorded in 2013. But it’s unclear how far — and to whom — Paul extends the argument that rights cannot be defined by behavior.” [Buzzfeed, 3/31/15] Hillary Clinton declared that “gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights” to the international community. According to Sec. Clinton’s remarks in recognition of International Human Rights Day in Geneva, Switzerland, “I want to thank Director General Tokayev and Ms. Wyden along with other ministers, ambassadors, excellencies, and UN partners. This weekend, we will celebrate Human Rights Day, the anniversary of one of the great accomplishments of the last century. […] This recognition did not occur all at once. It evolved over time. And as it did, we understood that we were honoring rights that people always had, rather than creating new or special rights for them. Like being a woman, like being a racial, religious, tribal, or ethnic minority, being LGBT does not make you less human. And that is why gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights.” [Remarks in Recognition of International Human Rights Day, state.gov, 12/6/11] Race and Civil Rights Rand Paul believed that “good defenders of the First Amendment” should “tolerate” racial discrimination. “INTERVIEWER: But under your philosophy, it would be okay for Dr. King not to be served at the counter at Woolworths? PAUL: I would not go to that Woolworths, and I would stand up in my community and say that it is abhorrent, um, but, the hard part—and this is the hard part about believing in freedom—is, if you believe in the First Amendment, for example—you have too, for example, most good defenders of the First Amendment will believe in abhorrent groups standing up and saying awful things. . . . It’s the same way with other behaviors. In a free society, we will tolerate boorish people, who have abhorrent behavior.” [ThinkProgress, 5/19/10] Hillary Clinton: “For anyone to assert that race is not a problem in America is to deny the reality in front of our very eyes.” “In the first presidential debate designed to focus on minority issues, the Democratic contenders aggressively sought to outmuscle one another on the topics of race and poverty and derided yesterday’s Supreme Court decision banning most affirmative action in public schools… ‘You can look at this stage and see an African American, a Latino, a woman contesting for the presidency of the United States,’ Clinton said. ‘But there is so much left to be done, and for anyone to assert that race is not a problem in America is to deny the reality in front of our very eyes.’” [Washington Post, 6/29/07] Minimum Wage Rand Paul opposes increasing the minimum wage. “Senators Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio oppose the president’s plan to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 from the $7.25 it’s at now. But should the federal government set a minimum wage at all? […] The line drew big applause but didn’t answer the question—which Karl tried to call him on. So should there be any minimum wage? Paul said, ‘Minimum wage is only harmful when it’s above the market wage.’” [Bloomberg, 1/26/15] Hillary Clinton cosponsored the Fair Minimum Wage Act five times in the Senate. Hillary Clinton sponsored the Fair Minimum Wage Act five times in the Senate. Although she opposed the Iraq funding bill it was folded into, Clinton cosponsored the original version of the Fair Minimum Wage Act that increased the minimum wage for the first time in ten years, from $5.85 to $7.25 an hour. [S. 277, 2/7/01; S. 20, 1/7/03; S. 2370, 4/20/04; S. 1062, 5/18/05; S. 2, 1/4/07] Climate Change Rand Paul claimed that the science behind climate change was “not conclusive.” “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said in a recent interview that the science behind climate change is ‘not conclusive,’ calling people who tie extreme weather to a changing climate ignorant.” [The Hill, 4/23/14] Hillary Clinton called climate change the “most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face as a nation and world.” “Climate change is the ‘most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face as a nation and world,’ Clinton said at the National Clean Energy Summit 7.0 in Nevada. ‘The data is unforgiving no matter what the deniers try to assert.’” [The Hill, 9/4/14] Iran Letter Rand Paul was one of 47 GOP senators that signed an open letter to Iranian leadership attacking a potential nuclear deal with Iran. “The letter, signed by 47 GOP senators including Paul, warned that without congressional approval, any deal between President Obama and Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, could be easily reversed. ‘The next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen,’ they wrote, ‘and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.’” [CBS News, 3/16/15] Hillary Clinton slammed Republican Senators for undermining American leadership by sending an open letter to Iran’s leaders. In a tweet, Hillary Clinton wrote, “GOP letter to Iranian clerics undermines American leadership. No one considering running for commander-in-chief should be signing on.” [3/11/15, 3:11 p.m. EDT] Medicare Rand Paul introduced legislation “that would end traditional Medicare.” “A group of Senate Republicans has introduced legislation that would end traditional Medicare and sign seniors up for the same private healthcare plans received by members of Congress. The ‘Congressional Health Care for Seniors Act’ would allow seniors to choose from the array of plans currently offered to the four million federal employees and their dependents in the Federal Employee Health Benefit program, starting in 2014. It would also gradually increase the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 70 over a 20-year period. The bill was introduced Thursday by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). South Carolina Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint are co-sponsors, along with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah).” [The Hill, 3/15/12] Hillary Clinton believed that Medicare was “part of a fair deal that our country has established between working and retired Americans.” “Those of us who support Medicare believe it is part of a fair deal that our country has established between working and retired Americans. Now this Administration and the Republican Leadership want to abandon this tradition. They want to get rid of Medicare instead of making it stronger.” [Senator Clinton press release, 3/13/03 (via archive.org)] Medicare Eligibility Rand Paul supported raising the Medicare eligibility age to 70. “In addition to letting Medicare seniors join the same excellent health care plan enjoyed by Members of Congress and federal employees, Dr. Paul proposes raising the Medicare retirement age from 65 to 70, very gradually, over a generation.” [FreedomWorks, 3/15/12] Hillary Clinton supported allowing Americans aged 50 to 65 to “buy into Medicare.” “We also need to allow people between 50 and 65 to buy into Medicare. Many of them retire early or many of them lose their health insurance and they’re left waiting until they can be eligible for Medicare.” [Senator Clinton speech at the Economic Club of Chicago, 4/11/06 (via archive.org)] Employee Non-Discrimination Act Rand Paul voted against the Employee Non-Discrimination Act. In November 2013, Paul voted against the Employee Non-Discrimination Act, legislation that would prohibit employers from “engaging in employment discrimination on the basis of an individual’s actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.” [S. 815, 4/25/13] Hillary Clinton repeatedly cosponsored the Employment Non-Discrimination Act to prevent employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. In the Senate, Hillary Clinton was an original cosponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2002 and 2003 to prevent employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Hillary Clinton has said it is “inconceivable to me that people who work hard and do a good job every day can still be fired because of who they love. It’s unfair, it’s un-American, and I will put a stop to it once and for all.” [S.1284, 7/31/01; S.1705, 10/2/03; Human Rights Campaign 2008 Presidential Questionnaire]  Same-Sex Marriage Rand Paul lamented the “moral crisis that allows people to think that there would be some sort of other marriage” in addition to “traditional” marriage. “At a prayer breakfast in Washington, D.C. on Thursday morning, Rand Paul practiced pandering. The senator from Kentucky will announce that he is running for president in less than two weeks, and it seems the pressure to be all things to all people is resulting in the breakdown of his political brand, with the latest example being his newly articulated position on marriage. He conceded to the evangelical crowd, which included Dr. Jerry Johnson, CEO of the National Religious Broadcasters, that there is a ‘moral crisis in our country’ and more specifically, ‘a moral crisis that allows people to think that there would be some sort of other marriage’ in addition to heterosexual, or ‘traditional,’ marriage.” [Daily Beast, 3/28/15] Hillary Clinton: “I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples.” Secretary Hillary Clinton: “LGBT Americans are our colleagues, our teachers, our soldiers, our friends, our loved ones, and they are full and equal citizens and deserve the rights of citizenship. That includes marriage. That’s why I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples. I support it personally and as a matter of policy and law.” [Human Rights Campaign, 3/18/13] Violence Against Women Act Rand Paul voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act. “Why it matters: Ryan is one of three current members of Congress frequently mentioned as a potential 2016 presidential candidate. The other two — Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) — both voted against reauthorizing VAWA, citing a preference that such decisions be made locally.” [Washington Post, 2/28/13; Senate roll call vote 19, 2/12/13] Hillary Clinton cosponsored the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization. “Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton today hailed the unanimous approval by the US Senate of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) reauthorization. VAWA expired on Saturday, October 1st and the reauthorization bill will now ensure that the critical programs authorized by VAWA continue. Senator Clinton was a co-sponsor of the bill, S. 1197. ‘The Violence Against Women Act focuses resources and attention on some of the most vulnerable women in our society — women who too often suffer in silence,’ said Senator Clinton. ‘I am so pleased that by passing this bill, the Senate finally reaffirmed its commitment to helping prevent and cope with domestic abuse.’” [Senator Clinton press release, 10/5/05; S. 1197, 6/8/05] Abortion and “Personhood” Rand Paul sponsored an anti-abortion “personhood” bill that could outlaw forms of emergency contraceptives. “Paul, a likely Republican presidential candidate, sponsored an anti-abortion bill in 2013 that defines life as beginning at fertilization. Democrats say the so-called ‘Personhood’ measure would outlaw Plan B and other emergency contraceptives.” [CNN, 9/30/14; S. 583, 3/14/13] Hillary Clinton derided “personhood” legislation as efforts to “outlaw common forms of birth control and ban abortions even in cases of rape or incest.” “Clinton also hit hard on raising the minimum wage, saying it’s a ‘pro-family’ issue — and offered a full-throated defense of legal abortion. ‘Women’s rights are the canary in the mine. If you don’t protect women’s rights here at home and around the world, everybody’s rights are lost,’ she said. ‘You have to ask yourself, do you want a senator who will always defend a woman’s right to make her own healthcare decisions and won’t ever shame or judge a woman for decisions that are complex and deeply personal, or do you want a senator who will push so-called ‘personhood’ laws that would outlaw common forms of birth control and ban abortions even in cases of rape or incest?’” [The Hill, 10/25/14] Unemployment Insurance Rand Paul opposed extending unemployment insurance for out-of-work Americans. “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Sunday he opposes extending unemployment benefits for workers, arguing that it would be a ‘disservice’ to jobless individuals. ‘I do support unemployment benefits for the 26 weeks that they’re paid for. If you extend it beyond that, you do a disservice to these workers,’ he said in an interview on ‘Fox News Sunday.’” [Huffington Post, 12/8/13; Senate roll call vote 24, 2/6/14] Hillary Clinton continuously fought to extend unemployment insurance for U.S. workers. Hillary Clinton repeatedly supported legislative efforts to extend unemployment assistance for out-of-work Americans throughout her Senate career. [S. 3009, 9/26/02; S. 225, 1/28/03;S. 1708, 10/2/03; S. 2006, 1/20/04; S. 2544, 1/22/08; S. 3507, 9/17/08] Planned Parenthood Rand Paul voted to defund Planned Parenthood. “Rand Paul has previously voted to defund Planned Parenthood and said he would “stop the flow of tax dollars to groups who perform or advocate for abortion.” Marco Rubio joined Paul in the vote to defund the health provider, and has made no secret of his plans to further restrict access.” [Salon, 2/27/15; Senate roll call vote 60, 4/14/11] Hillary Clinton believed that the “overarching mission of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America…is as relevant in our world now as it was 100 years ago.” “It was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award,” said U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, in accepting the award. “It’s part of a movement which is about economic and political progress for all women and girls. It’s about making sure that every woman and girl everywhere has the opportunity she deserves to fulfill her potential, the potential as a mother, worker and human being. The overarching mission of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the cause of reproductive freedom that you continue to advance today is as relevant in our world now as it was 100 years ago. So, I thank you.” [Planned Parenthood news release, 5/14/14] Social Security Rand Paul called Social Security “a Ponzi scheme” and supported efforts to privatize the program. “In the late 1990s, Paul — then a simple ophthalmologist and president of Kentucky Taxpayers United — appeared on several episodes ‘Kentucky Tonight,’ a roundtable-style show on public television. He talked about the elderly dying at the hands of Medicare rationing; the need to privatize Social Security, which he called ‘a Ponzi scheme;’ and the rights of the government to invest in racist companies.” [Talking Points Memo, 7/12/10] Hillary Clinton: “When I am president, privatizing Social Security will certainly not be even discussed.” “I don’t think there’s any doubt that we’ve got to fight and finally bury the idea of privatizing Social Security. It is one of those bad ideas that deserve to be totally buried. When I am president, privatizing Social Security will certainly not be even discussed. I reject the view of President Bush and others who have given large tax cuts to the wealthiest, failed to crack down on offshore tax dodgers, and handed out no-bid contracts to companies like Halliburton, and then insisted that we needed to cut benefits to middle-class retirees.” [Senator Clinton speech on Retirement Security, 10/9/07 (via archive.org)] Social Security Retirement Age Rand Paul sought to raise the Social Security retirement age. “During my time in Congress, I have worked on proposals that would fully fix the shortfall in the Social Security program through a gradual increase in the age of full retirement and by means testing yearly earnings, while preserving those benefits for near and current retirees. These changes would only apply to younger Americans who have time to plan for the future.” [Office of Senator Rand Paul, accessed 11/19/14] Hillary Clinton: “Raising the retirement age isn’t the answer” to preserving Social Security. “Let me start with calling for a renewed national commitment to Social Security, this is the most successful domestic program in the history of the United States. And you don’t have to worry, when I’m president, privatization is off the table, because it does not answer anything. From my perspective cutting benefits is not the answer, raising the retirement age isn’t the answer, we need to get back to the fiscal responsibilities that we had in the 1990s where we weren’t raiding the social security trust fund anymore. When my husband left office, we had a secure Social Security system until 2055, and now all of the sudden the Bush administration took us back into deficits we lost 14 years off the solvency of the Social Security trust fund in the last six and a half years.” [NBC News, 9/4/07]  Gun Control Rand Paul opposed any legislation enacting new restrictions in gun ownership. According to a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, signed by Sens. Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz, “The Second Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens’ right to self-defense. It speaks to history’s lesson that government cannot in in all places at all times, and history’s warning about the oppression of a government that tries. We will oppose the motion to proceed to any legislation that will serve as a vehicle for any additional gun restrictions.” [United States Senate Letter – Signed by Sen. Rand Paul, 3/22/13] Hillary Clinton voted to extend the Assault Weapons ban and cosponsored legislation to require background checks at gun shows. Sen. Clinton voted for a ten-year extension of the ban on assault weapons. Senator Clinton cosponsored legislation requiring background checks for firearms purchases at gun shows and from unlicensed dealers. “Senator Clinton is an original co-sponsor of legislation introduced by Senator Jack Reed, to require criminal background checks on individuals who purchase firearms at gun shows from unlicensed dealers. Currently, unlicensed dealers at gun shows are able to skirt the background checks that are required of licensed gun dealers under the Brady Law. This law — which requires licensed gun dealers to conduct background checks of potential purchasers in order to prevent felons, fugitives and stalkers from buying firearms — has resulted in approximately 536,000 criminals or other prohibited purchasers being denied access to firearms.” [Senator Clinton press release, 4/24/01 (via archive.org); S. 767, 4/24/01; Senate roll call vote 24, 3/2/04] Universal Health Insurance Coverage Rand Paul compared the “right to health care” to slavery. “A hearing of the Senate HELP Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging looked at emergency room use and took an odd turn Wednesday when Sen. Rand Paul compared the ‘right to health care’ to slavery. ‘With regard to the idea whether or not you have a right to health care you have to realize what that implies. I am a physician. You have a right to come to my house and conscript me. It means you believe in slavery. You are going to enslave not only me but the janitor at my hospital, the person who cleans my office, the assistants, the nurses. … You are basically saying you believe in slavery,’ said Paul (R-Ky.), who is an ophthalmologist.” [Politico, 5/11/11] Hillary Clinton was “committed to providing quality affordable health care for every American.” “I remain committed to providing quality affordable health care for every American. Now, some people might say, well, Senator, didn’t you try that before, you know, back in 1993 and 1994? And I did. I worked at my husband’s request to try to see if we could do what was necessary to create a system that everybody could be part of. And we were not successful, and we made a bunch of mistakes, and I’ve learned from all of that. And I have the scars to show what we went through.” [Senator Clinton campaign Let the Conversation Begin webcast, 1/22/07 (via archive.org)] Net Neutrality Rand Paul opposes net neutrality. “No Republican presidential contender has done more at this stage to woo Silicon Valley and the tech community than Rand Paul has. […] But besides his party label, there’s one problem with Paul’s message when it comes to winning over this traditionally Democratic-leaning community – he opposes net neutrality.” [NBC News, 4/6/15] Hillary Clinton cosponsored legislation to protect net neutrality. Hillary Clinton repeatedly cosponsored the Internet Freedom Preservation Act, legislation that she stated would “ensure that open, unimpaired and unencumbered Internet access for both its users and content providers is preserved.” In a statement released announcing her support of the 2006 version of the bill, Hillary Clinton affirmed that efforts “to fundamentally alter the inherently democratic structure of the Internet must be rejected.” [S. 2917, 5/19/06; S. 215, 1/9/07] Foreign Policy Rand Paul promoted “an isolationist foreign policy that some in his own party have criticized.” “At each event, Paul shared his vision for the country, which includes an isolationist foreign policy that some in his own party have criticized. Paul says government’s reach needs to be scaled back domestically as well, and was quick to slam President Barack Obama on the country’s current hot topic — immigration.” [NBC News, 8/5/14] Hillary Clinton supported a foreign policy of “reaching out to both friends and adversaries, to bolster old alliances and to forge new ones.” “Smart power requires reaching out to both friends and adversaries, to bolster old alliances and to forge new ones. That means strengthening the alliances that have stood the test of time— especially with our NATO partners and our allies in Asia. Our alliance with Japan is a cornerstone of American policy in Asia, essential to maintaining peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region, and based on shared values and mutual interests. We also have crucial economic and security partnerships with South Korea, Australia, and other friends in ASEAN. We will build on our economic and political partnership with India, the world’s most populous democracy and a nation with growing influence in the world.” [Nomination Hearing to be Secretary of State, state.gov, 1/13/09] Foreign Aid Rand Paul proposed a budget to cut all United States foreign aid. “I go to a tea party, and you know what they say to me? ‘It’s not enough. It’s not enough. Where’s the other trillion you need?’ Paul said. He’s offered his own budget plan that would cut spending by $500 billion this year, including an end to all foreign aid and a dramatic reduction to the U.S. Department of Education’s budget.” [Politico, 2/4/11] Hillary Clinton: “Americans should take pride” in our contributions to international development, “which have not only helped humanity but have also helped our nation project our values and strengthen our leadership in the world.” In her book Hard Choices, Secretary Clinton wrote, “In the international development business, it’s easy to get frustrated and fatalistic. But step back and look at the sweep of history, and you realize just how remarkable our country’s contributions have been. Just in my lifetime the United States has helped eradicate smallpox and reduce polio and malaria. We helped save millions of lives through immunizations, life-saving treatment for AIDS, and oral rehydration therapy that greatly reduced the deaths of infants and children. We helped educate millions of young people and provided significant support to once impoverished countries that have flourished and become generous donors themselves, such as South Korea. Americans should take pride in these achievements, which have not only helped humanity but have also helped our nation project our values and strengthen our leadership in the world.” [Hard Choices, pg. 544, 2014] Aid to Israel Rand Paul said he would support ending all foreign aid to Israel. According to a transcript of an interview with Rand Paul on CNN, “PAUL: Well, I think what you have to do is you have to look. When you send foreign aid, you actually quite a bit to Israel’s enemies, Islamic nations around Israel get quite a bit of foreign aid, too. BLITZER: Egypt gets almost the same amount? PAUL: Almost the same amount so really you have to ask yourself, are we funding an arms race on both sides? I have a lot of sympathy and respect for Israel as a democratic nation, as a, you know, a fountain of piece and a fountain of democracy within the Middle East. But at the same time, I don’t think funding both sides of the arm race, particularly when we have to borrow the money from China to send it to someone else. We just can’t do it anymore. The debt is all consuming and it threatens our well being as a country. BLITZER: All right, so just to be precise, end all foreign aid including the foreign aid to Israel as well. Is that right? PAUL: Yes.” [CNN, 1/26/11] Upon taking office, Hillary Clinton and Pres. Obama immediately “got to work expanding security cooperation and investing in key joint defense projects” in Israel, “including Iron Dome.” In her book Hard Choices, Secretary Clinton wrote, “For years, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the United States had been committed to helping Israel maintain a ‘qualitative military edge’ over every competitor in the region. President Obama and I wanted to take it to the next level. Right away, we got to work expanding security cooperation and investing in key joint defense projects, including Iron Dome, a short-range missile defense system to help protect Israeli cities and homes from rockets.” [Hard Choices, pg. 306, 2014] Card Check/EFCA Rand Paul opposed Card Check legislation. “After spending an estimated $1 BILLION to re-elect Barack Obama and maintain control of the U.S. Senate, the union bosses expect PAYBACK. And they’re wasting no time demanding passage of the Card Check Forced Unionism Bill as payback. If ‘Card Check’ passes, it will strip workers of the secret ballot so union thugs can intimidate workers one-on-one — or three-on-one — into signing so-called ‘union authorization cards.’ That’s why it’s vital you sign the petition below DEMANDING your Congressman and Senators OPPOSE Big Labor’s Card Check Forced Unionism Bill.” [National Right to Work Committee – Letter from Sen. Rand Paul, accessed 9/25/14] Hillary Clinton pledged to “be the president who signs the Employee Free Choice Act” and cosponsored the Employee Free Choice Act of 2007. “Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton today joined thousands of workers in calling for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. The bill, cosponsored by Senator Clinton, will strengthen workers’ right to organize. […] The Employee Free Choice Act would level the playing field between workers and employers by: Permitting workers to form a union through ‘majority sign-up,’ a process in which workers present signed authorization cards as demonstration of their choice to belong to a union; Requiring mediation and arbitration to help employers and employees reach a first contract in a reasonable period of time; and Strengthening penalties against employers who violate the labor laws.” [Democratic presidential debate, 8/7/07; Senator Clinton campaign press release, 6/19/07 (via archive.org); S.1041, 3/29/07] Hobby Lobby Rand Paul said that the hobby lobby decision was “in favor of religious freedom” and that it meant “all Americans can stay true to their faith without fear of big government intervention or punishment.”   According to a press release from the office of Senator Rand Paul, “‘Today, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of religious freedom by taking a stand with Hobby Lobby. Religious liberty will remain intact and all Americans can stay true to their faith without fear of big government intervention or punishment,’ Sen. Paul said. ‘Our nation was founded on the principle of freedom, and with this decision, America will continue to serve as a safe haven for those looking to exercise religious liberty.’” [Press Release, Office of Senator Rand Paul, 6/30/14 (via archive.org)] Hillary Clinton said the Hobby Lobby decision was “troubling.” “Hard-working women will pay the price for today’s two troubling #SCOTUS decisions — in wages, health care & dignity.” [6/30/14, 6:34 p.m. EDT] Loretta Lynch Rand Paul opposes Loretta Lynch’s nomination for Attorney General. “Sen. Rand Paul is opposing Loretta Lynch’s nomination for attorney general, saying her support for President Barack Obama’s immigration actions ‘rides roughshod on our Constitutional rights.’ The Kentucky Republican becomes the second of his party’s 2016 presidential contenders to publicly oppose Lynch’s confirmation as Eric Holder’s replacement as head of the Justice Department, joining Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.” [CNN, 2/5/15] Sec. Clinton called Loretta Lynch a “great nominee” and condemned the blocking of her confirmation vote. “Partisan tensions rose in the days after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN he would not schedule a vote for Lynch until an otherwise bipartisan human trafficking bill — stalled over an abortion provision opposed by most Democrats — passes the chamber. […] Even likely Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton weighed in, saying in a pair of tweets: ‘Congressional trifecta against women today: 1) Blocking great nominee, 1st African American woman AG, for longer than any AG in 30 years……2) Playing politics with trafficking victims… 3) Threatening women’s health & rights.’” [CNN, 3/17/15]

 

 

 

]]>
Hillary Clinton: Making Human Rights a Reality https://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-making-human-rights-a-reality/ Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:24:14 +0000 http://correct2016.wpengine.com/?p=1060 “The potential within every person to learn, discover and embrace the world around them, the potential to join freely with others to shape their communities and their societies so that every person can find fulfillment and self-sufficiency, the potential to share life’s beauties and tragedies, laughter and tears with the people we love – that potential is sacred.”        – Secretary Hillary Clinton, 12/14/09

Making human rights a foreign policy priority.

Building on a lifetime of advocacy for human rights, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton affirmed that American foreign policy would “reflect our deep commitment to the cause of making human rights a reality for millions of oppressed people around the world.” One of Secretary Clinton’s first steps to secure human rights as a pillar of foreign policy was joining the United Nations Human Rights Council, reversing the Bush administration’s policy of shunning the organization. She pledged to focus her energy as Secretary of State on human rights and, through the Human Rights Council, the U.S. deepened international engagement on efforts to fight human rights violations.

Defending free expression and speech.

Hillary Clinton upheld that universal rights “include freedom of expression and freedom of belief, even if our words or beliefs denigrate the humanity of others. Yet, while we are each free to believe whatever we choose, we cannot do whatever we choose, not in a world where we protect the human rights of all.” She stood by those “who exercise their fundamental freedoms of expression and assembly in a peaceful way, whether in person, in print, or in pixels,” and fought powerfully for those who support expanding human rights and individuals working to advance democracy.

Upholding the fundamental freedom of the press.

Hillary Clinton hosted the first World Press Freedom Day by the U.S. to “champion those who stand for media freedom – and let us continue to expose those who deny it.” As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton went on Russian radio to express “support for independent media…at a time when free expression is under threat” and denounced the murders of journalists in Russia. She praised the “brave men and women” of independent media “who risk their lives every day to keep the rest of us informed, to keep governments accountable and societies more democratic, prosperous and successful.”

Promoting religious protection and tolerance.

Hillary Clinton underscored the responsibility governments have in standing up for the rights of all people as religious freedom is threatened. She challenged other countries, such as China, by calling for “protection of rights of minorities in Tibet and Xinxiang; for the rights to express oneself and worship freely.” In 2011, Hillary worked with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and other nations to secure adoption of the U.N. Human Rights Council resolution “[c]ombating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against, persons based on religion or belief.”

Giving a voice to the vulnerable and marginalized.

Hillary Clinton launched an assistance fund for embattled nongovernmental organizations that supported much needed “legal representation, communication technologies like cell phones and internet access, and other forms of quick support.” She appointed the first Special Advisor for International Disability Rights to increase protection for “one group of people whose human rights are still denied in too many parts of the world today. In many ways, they are an invisible minority.” As Secretary of State, she spoke out against regimes who arbitrarily detain and arrest artists, activists, lawyers, and intellectuals in their countries.

Advocating globally for LGBT rights.

Hillary Clinton championed LGBT rights internationally and declared to the world that gay rights are human rights and human rights are gay rights. In partnership with other countries, she worked to support LGBT advocacy and pass the first United Nations resolution highlighting “the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons.” As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton forcefully spoke out against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and denounced countries who criminalize homosexuality.

Setting an example internationally.

Hillary Clinton helped set an international example by participating in the U.N. Universal Periodic Review of America’s human rights record, stating, “By holding ourselves accountable, we reinforce our moral authority to demand that all governments adhere to obligations under international law.” Hillary also included the U.S. for the first time in a country report on human trafficking and helped launch a website to provide NGOs, scholars, and citizens with “information they need to hold governments accountable.”

Continuing work to make human rights a human reality.

When Hillary Clinton was asked what was next for her, she said, “I would go back to being a voice for the voiceless, standing up against conditions that just leech the life out of children and oppress women and prevent people from fulfilling their God-given potential.” In 2013, Hillary was honored by Jeb Bush for her public service and dedication “to serving and engaging people across the world in democracy.” She outlined a vision for the future where the U.S. can “show the world that free people and free markets, human rights and human dignity, respect for our fellow men and women, is our core strength.” Hillary launched efforts to address the “unfinished business of the 21st century” – seeking women’s full participation in society – and give future generations of Americans a chance at success.

]]>
Hillary Clinton: Education for Girls’ Futures https://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-education-for-girls-futures/ Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:51:59 +0000 http://correct2016.wpengine.com/?p=955 Through the 2014 Clinton Global Initiative, Hillary Clinton unveiled a new program, CHARGE: The Collaborative for Harnessing Ambition and Resources for Girls Education, to provide secondary education for 14 million girls over five years. The plight of women and girls around the world is a concern Hillary Clinton knows well. As Secretary of State, she raised the status of women and girls around the world, increasing the chance for girls to receive an education and to improve their futures. Recognizing that no society can achieve its full potential “when half the population is denied the opportunity to achieve theirs,” Sec. Clinton made advancing education for girls a major focus of U.S. foreign policy efforts.

Launched Education Initiatives to Raise the Status of Girls Around the World

Sec. Clinton launched multiple public and private sector initiatives to raise the status of girls and promote girls’ education around the world.

According to a fact sheet on Sec. Clinton’s new public and private initiatives to raise the status of girls, “On the eve of the inaugural International Day of the Girl Child, Secretary Clinton today convened a meeting with leaders in government and the private sector, including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Chair of The Elders, to discuss their shared commitment to improving the lives of girls worldwide. Following the meeting, the Secretary announced new U.S. Government and private initiatives to prevent child marriage and promote girls’ education around the world.” [“Secretary Clinton Launches New Public and Private Initiatives to Raise the Status of Girls,” state.gov, 10/10/12]

Sec. Clinton started the TechGirls classroom exchange program to increase the number of girls entering the tech field.

According to a State Department press release, “The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announced today that the inaugural group of TechGirls – an initiative that brings 25 teenage girls from Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, the Palestinian Territories, Tunisia, and Yemen to the United States – will arrive June 25 in New York City for a three-week exchange. As part of U.S. efforts to increase the number of girls and women entering the technology field, the TechGirls will engage with their American counterparts in the classroom and within the broader technology community as they learn how to harness their potential in the science and technology sectors through hands-on skill development, such as programming, robotics, mobile application building, web design, video graphics, and 3D game design.” [“TechGirls: Empowering Girls in the Middle East and North Africa through Technology,” state.gov, 6/22/12]

Under Sec. Clinton, the State Department partnered with the NGO Room to Read to support girls from South Asia who were at risk of dropping out of school.

According to Sec. Clinton’s remarks at the UNESCO Global Partnership for Girls’ and Women’s Education, “The United States has partnered with the NGO Room to Read to support girls from South Asia who are at risk of dropping out of school. This is a small project. We invested only $145,000 in things like school uniforms, shoes, educational supplies, and medical checkups. And we also put in place support for mentoring programs, tutoring and community organizing. Not a single one of the more than 1,000 participating girls dropped out of school.” [Remarks at the UNESCO Global Partnership for Girls’ and Women’s Education, state.gov, 5/26/11]

Sec. Clinton introduced the Empowering Adolescent Girls to Lead through Education (EAGLE) initiative, emphasizing leadership training and reducing barriers for girls to attend secondary school.

According to a State Department fact sheet on Sec. Clinton’s new public and private initiatives to raise the status of girls, “Empowering Adolescent Girls to Lead through Education (EAGLE). The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) are working together to ensure thousands of adolescent girls in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) make successful transitions to secondary school. Just 11 percent of Congolese women over age 25 have secondary educations, and studies show that keeping girls in school dramatically reduces their vulnerability to HIV and improves overall health outcomes. A five-year $15 million initiative, EAGLE seeks to raise this rate by tackling many of the barriers keeping girls from continuing their post-primary educations – including cost and school safety. The program will emphasize leadership training for girls.” [“Secretary Clinton Launches New Public and Private Initiatives to Raise the Status of Girls,” state.gov, 10/10/12]

Spearheaded Efforts to Study and Improve Education for Girls

Sec. Clinton launched the Secretary’s International Fund for Women and Girls to invest in improvements to education, health, and economic opportunities.

According to a State Department press release, “Secretary Clinton announced the launch of the ‘Secretary’s International Fund for Women and Girls’ this morning during remarks for the Summit on Entrepreneurship. The Fund is a State Department-led public-private partnership committed to providing flexible, rapid, targeted, and high-impact grants to nongovernmental organizations working to meet the critical needs of women and girls around the world. It is administered by the Secretary’s Office of Global Women’s Issues. The Fund invests in efficient and innovative solutions to combat violence, improve health and education, promote climate change solutions, and create economic and political opportunities for women and girls.” [“Secretary Clinton Announces the ‘Secretary’s International Fund for Women and Girls,’” state.gov, 4/28/10]

Sec. Clinton’s State Department sponsored teacher exchange programs focused on education for girls.

According to Sec. Clinton’s remarks in honor of the first-ever International Day of the Girl, “Every teacher who comes to the United States through our teacher training programs will receive training to address the challenges that girls face staying in school. And we will sponsor teacher exchanges focused exclusively on girls’ education.” [Remarks in Honor of the First-ever International Day of the Girl, state.gov, 10/10/12]

Sec. Clinton initiated a study with UNESCO on “education for women and girls around the world.”

In her remarks at the UNESCO Global Partnership for Girls’ and Women’s Education, Sec. Clinton said, “The United States is proud to join with UNESCO to launch what we hope will be an important new study on education for women and girls around the world. And before you say, ‘Another report,’ which is often the reaction, let me quickly add that this report will draw on UNESCO’s unique expertise in data collection and analysis to provide new insights into the causes of gender disparities and education and what we can do about them. It will focus in particular on two critical areas: adult literacy and secondary education. We are making progress in many parts of the world on primary education, but something happens at the end of primary school.” [Remarks at the UNESCO Global Partnership for Girls’ and Women’s Education, state.gov, 5/26/11]

Secured Greater Investment in Education for Women and Girls

Sec. Clinton launched a partnership with the Abbott Fund “to invest one million dollars in the health and education” of women and girls.

In her remarks to the Lower Mekong Initiative Women’s Gender Equality and Empowerment Dialogue in Cambodia, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, “[T]oday I am pleased to add that we are also launching a new partnership with the nonprofit Abbott Fund to invest one million dollars in the health and education for women and girls.” [Remarks to the Lower Mekong Initiative Women’s Gender Equality and Empowerment Dialogue, state.gov, 7/13/12]

The MasterCard Foundation Scholars Program committed $39 million to support secondary education to disadvantaged girls in Ghana and Uganda.

According to a State Department fact sheet on Sec. Clinton’s new public and private initiatives to raise the status of girls, including, “The MasterCard Foundation Scholars Program. As part of a $500 million commitment to education, The MasterCard Foundation has committed $39 million over the next ten years to provide comprehensive support for secondary education, including peer support and mentorship, to talented yet economically disadvantaged girls in Ghana and Uganda.” [“Secretary Clinton Launches New Public and Private Initiatives to Raise the Status of Girls,” state.gov, 10/10/12]

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation committed $10 million to improve participation in education for marginalized girls.

According to a State Department fact sheet on Sec. Clinton’s new public and private initiatives to raise the status of girls, including, “MacArthur Foundation Girls Secondary Education in Developing Countries Strategy. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has committed $10 million over the next five years to efforts to improve participation by marginalized girls in quality, relevant secondary education.” [“Secretary Clinton Launches New Public and Private Initiatives to Raise the Status of Girls,” state.gov, 10/10/12]

A collaborative effort by “the MacArthur Foundation, The MasterCard Foundation, the Douglas B. Marshall Jr. Family Foundation and two anonymous donors” awarded $6 million to support secondary education initiatives.

According to a State Department fact sheet on Sec. Clinton’s new public and private initiatives to raise the status of girls, including, “Joint Initiative on Girls’ Secondary Education. The MacArthur Foundation, The MasterCard Foundation, the Douglas B. Marshall Jr. Family Foundation and two anonymous donors will collaborate to award more than $6 million over the next year to support innovative secondary education initiatives that provide learning opportunities and life and livelihood skills for underserved youth in East Africa, Nigeria, and India, with a special focus on girls.” [“Secretary Clinton Launches New Public and Private Initiatives to Raise the Status of Girls,” state.gov, 10/10/12]

]]>
Hillary Clinton: Global LGBT Advocate https://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-global-lgbt-advocate/ https://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-global-lgbt-advocate/#comments Thu, 14 Aug 2014 22:09:45 +0000 http://correct2016.wpengine.com/?p=908 Secretary Clinton championed the cause of gay rights around the world.

In recognition of International Human Rights Day, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton loudly and proudly declared gay rights are human rights. Her commitment to advancing the rights of LGBT individuals around the world produced the first ever UN resolution on LGBT rights. Across the globe Sec. Clinton condemned the discrimination and violence enacted on the LGBT community and denounced criminalizing homosexuality.

“When Hillary Clinton gave that speech in front of the Human Rights Council in Geneva and said five simple words, ‘Gay rights are human rights,’ she transformed the debate. And standing here with Robyn, I want to build on that legacy, because LGBT rights are human rights, and human rights are LGBT rights.”     -Secretary of State John Kerry, 6/19/14

Championed Gay Rights as Human Rights Around the World

Made LGBT Rights A Part of U.S. Foreign Policy

Sec. Clinton directed the State Department to “champion a comprehensive human rights agenda” that included protection of LGBT human rights.

“Human rights are inalienable and belong to every person, no matter who that person is or whom that person loves. Since January 2009, Secretary Clinton has directed the Department to champion a comprehensive human rights agenda — one that includes the protection of the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. The Department uses its full range of diplomatic and development tools to press for the elimination of violence and discrimination against LGBT people worldwide, particularly those forced to flee their homes or countries.” [State Dept. Fact Sheet: Promoting Human Rights of LGBT People, 12/6/11]

Sec. Clinton made the promotion of equality for gay people a core value of U.S. foreign policy. 

According to the Miami Herald’s world affairs columnist and former CNN producer and correspondent Frida Ghitis, “As Hillary Clinton makes a whirlwind round of appearances in her last days as secretary of state, one groundbreaking aspect of her work deserves a moment in the spotlight: In a bold departure with tradition, Clinton made the promotion of equality for gay people a core value of U.S. foreign policy. That is a transformative change, one that advances the cause of human rights around the world — not just for gays and lesbians, but for everyone.” [Frida Ghitis, CNN, 2/8/13]

Sec. Clinton declared that “gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights” to the international community.

According to Sec. Clinton’s remarks in recognition of International Human Rights Day in Geneva, Switzerland, “I want to thank Director General Tokayev and Ms. Wyden along with other ministers, ambassadors, excellencies, and UN partners. This weekend, we will celebrate Human Rights Day, the anniversary of one of the great accomplishments of the last century. […] This recognition did not occur all at once. It evolved over time. And as it did, we understood that we were honoring rights that people always had, rather than creating new or special rights for them. Like being a woman, like being a racial, religious, tribal, or ethnic minority, being LGBT does not make you less human. And that is why gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights.” [Remarks in Recognition of International Human Rights Day, state.gov, 12/6/11]

Sec. Clinton secured a policy change for foreign aid appropriation that would “take into account” a country’s LGBT human rights record.

In her book Hard Choices, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote, “Early the next morning I learned that the White House had finally approved a policy change that we had been discussing. From now on, the United States would take into account the LGBT human rights record of a country when appropriating foreign aid. This kind of policy has a real chance of influencing the actions of other governments.” [Hard Choices, pg. 582, 2014]

Worked with Other Nations to Advance LGBT Human Rights

Sec. Clinton launched the Global Equality Fund to support LGBT human rights advocates in partnership with eight countries.

According to remarks by State Department Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Acting Assistant Secretary Uzra Zeya, “We regularly engage with and support civil society organizations to ensure our work does no harm and supports long-term change. In December 2011, then-Secretary Clinton launched the Global Equality Fund to support civil society advocates working to strengthen the human rights of LGBT persons. The United States has partnered with eight-like minded governments – France, Germany, Norway, the Netherlands, Finland, Iceland, Sweden, and Denmark – as well several foundations to raise and allocate more than $7 million dollars for projects in over 50 countries.” [Uzra Zeya Remarks on Protecting and Promoting LGBT Rights in Europe, state.gov, 10/24/13]

Sec. Clinton led U.S. efforts with other countries to pass the “first ever” UN resolution on the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons.

According to Sec. Clinton’s statement on the UN Human Rights Council resolution on sexual orientation and gender identity, “Today, the UN Human Rights Council adopted the first ever UN resolution on the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons. This represents a historic moment to highlight the human rights abuses and violations that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people face around the world based solely on who they are and whom they love. The United States worked with the main sponsor, South Africa, and a number of other countries from many regions of the world to help pass this resolution, including Brazil, Colombia, members of the European Union, and others.” [Statement on the United Nations Human Rights Council Resolution on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, state.gov, 6/17/11]

The State Department led efforts to reinsert language on sexual orientation into UN resolution on executions.

According to the Department of State’s Accomplishments Promoting the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People fact sheet, “In December 2010, the State Department led efforts at the UN General Assembly to reinsert language on sexual orientation into a resolution on extrajudicial, summary, and arbitrary executions, after the language’s removal in committee. The amendment was approved by a 93-55 margin.” [The Department of State’s Accomplishments Promoting the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People, state.gov, 12/6/11]

Forcefully Condemned LGBT Violence, Discrimination and Criminalization

Under Sec. Clinton, the U.S. joined with Colombia and Slovenia in securing passage of a UN Human Rights Council statement on ending violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

According to Sec. Clinton’s response on the UN Human Rights Council statement on ending violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity, “Today, 85 countries from every region of the world joined together in a historic moment to state clearly that human rights apply to everyone, no matter who they are or whom they love. The United States, along with Colombia and Slovenia, took a leading role on this statement along with over 30 cosponsors. Countries around the world participated including many that had never supported such efforts. And we hope that even more countries will step up, sign on to the statement and signal their support for universal human rights.” [UN Human Rights Council Statement on Ending Violence Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, state.gov, 3/22/11]

Sec. Clinton fought Ugandan efforts to criminalize homosexuality.

In a speech on the human rights agenda, Secretary Clinton said, “[T]he example that I used of a piece of legislation in Uganda which would not only criminalize homosexuality but attach the death penalty to it. We have expressed our concerns directly, indirectly, and we will continue to do so. The bill has not gone through the Ugandan legislature, but it has a lot of public support by various groups, including religious leaders in Uganda. And we view it as a very serious potential violation of human rights.” [Remarks on the Human Rights Agenda for the 21st Century, state.gov, 12/14/09]

Sec. Clinton: In many places in the world “violence against gays and lesbians – certainly discrimination and prejudice ­– are not just occurring, but condoned and protected.”

According to Sec. Clinton’s remarks at a European town hall, “Human rights is and will always be one of the pillars of our foreign policy, and in particular the persecution and discrimination against gays and lesbians is something that we take very seriously. It is terribly unfortunate…that right now in unfortunately many places in the world, violence against gays and lesbians – certainly discrimination and prejudice – are not just occurring, but condoned and protected. We would hope that over the next few years, we could have some influence in trying to change those attitudes.” [Remarks at a European Town Hall, state.gov, 3/6/09]

Sec. Clinton: “It is a violation of human rights when governments declare it illegal to be gay, or allow those who harm gay people to go unpunished.”

According to Sec. Clinton’s remarks on International Human Rights Day, “It is violation of human rights when people are beaten or killed because of their sexual orientation, or because they do not conform to cultural norms about how men and women should look or behave. It is a violation of human rights when governments declare it illegal to be gay, or allow those who harm gay people to go unpunished. It is a violation of human rights when lesbian or transgendered women are subjected to so-called corrective rape, or forcibly subjected to hormone treatments, or when people are murdered after public calls for violence toward gays, or when they are forced to flee their nations and seek asylum in other lands to save their lives. And it is a violation of human rights when life-saving care is withheld from people because they are gay, or equal access to justice is denied to people because they are gay, or public spaces are out of bounds to people because they are gay. No matter what we look like, where we come from, or who we are, we are all equally entitled to our human rights and dignity.” [Remarks in Recognition of International Human Rights Day, state.gov, 12/6/11]

]]>
https://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-global-lgbt-advocate/feed/ 1